From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com ([209.85.218.227]:48261 "EHLO mail-bw0-f227.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753785AbZLALwl (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2009 06:52:41 -0500 Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so3338838bwz.21 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 03:52:46 -0800 (PST) To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: python nl80211 code References: <87hbsb6pot.fsf@purkki.valot.fi> <1259659425.32171.54.camel@johannes.local> <87638r6l4i.fsf@purkki.valot.fi> <1259666699.32171.72.camel@johannes.local> <87ws166hlz.fsf@purkki.valot.fi> <1259668202.32171.73.camel@johannes.local> From: Kalle Valo Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:52:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1259668202.32171.73.camel@johannes.local> (Johannes Berg's message of "Tue\, 01 Dec 2009 12\:50\:02 +0100") Message-ID: <87skbu6hdf.fsf@purkki.valot.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Johannes Berg writes: >> Ok, good to know. What do you think if I remove the parsing of >> nl80211.h and instead add the nl80211 commands manually as python >> code? Sure, it's monkey code but easier to maintain IMHO. > > Yeah, I agree. Good. I'll do that then. >> Or have some intermediate language, maybe. Any ideas? > > I guess we could use sparse to output introspection information for > nl80211.h instead, but is it worth it? Increases coolness factory but that's about it =) -- Kalle Valo