From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0240C433DF for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 12:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFC02078D for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 12:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="j4Mm/XUH" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728993AbgFIMCZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 08:02:25 -0400 Received: from m43-7.mailgun.net ([69.72.43.7]:30404 "EHLO m43-7.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727903AbgFIMCX (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 08:02:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1591704143; h=Content-Type: MIME-Version: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Date: References: Subject: Cc: To: From: Sender; bh=wd4Bo0CqtMftMm7jBD9VlrOvgfzoGDIHMAGj3pgXL6Y=; b=j4Mm/XUHUCSvxuZx+a49YU284WjpNYjOYIFAst5VsaBsV6kG6sG5RElFBJA/0koshxW54T+j Lx3HiYCk6feDFwYnhgj0nMo6zcWSvCIky7Zc2JweNp6t2ogdpd6IFOO9ueIy1zt9rfbou0Ke mFQmyMtA3fXewW3qW5Ux5VjLCCE= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 69.72.43.7 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI3YTAwOSIsICJsaW51eC13aXJlbGVzc0B2Z2VyLmtlcm5lbC5vcmciLCAiYmU5ZTRhIl0= Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n11.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 5edf7a0aa3d8a44743950d6a (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Tue, 09 Jun 2020 12:01:14 GMT Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CAFE0C433C6; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 12:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from potku.adurom.net (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26028C433CA; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 12:01:07 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 26028C433CA Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Maharaja Kennadyrajan Cc: Ritesh Singh , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ath11k: remove "ath11k_mac_get_ar_vdev_stop_status" references References: <1590067829-26109-4-git-send-email-mkenna@codeaurora.org> <20200528073034.F14B9C43387@smtp.codeaurora.org> <80107de209f1149ecae07a50a7cf86a9@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 15:01:06 +0300 In-Reply-To: <80107de209f1149ecae07a50a7cf86a9@codeaurora.org> (Maharaja Kennadyrajan's message of "Tue, 09 Jun 2020 17:24:12 +0530") Message-ID: <87tuzkmosd.fsf@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Maharaja Kennadyrajan writes: > On 2020-05-28 13:00, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Maharaja Kennadyrajan wrote: >> >>> Unused structure ath11k_vdev_stop_status is removed. >>> 'ath11k_mac_get_ar_vdev_stop_status' api has been replaced >>> with 'ath11k_mac_get_ar_by_vdev_id' inside vdev_stopped_event. >>> >>> Tested-on: IPQ8074 WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1-00009-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Singh >>> Signed-off-by: Maharaja Kennadyrajan >>> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo >> >> What about other firmware branches? For example, will this break >> 2.1.0.1 branch support? > > [Maha]: It won't break 2.1.0.1 branch as it is host related change. What do you mean with "host related changed" exactly? In patch 1 I see that you add a new handler for WMI_VDEV_DELETE_RESP_EVENTID event. So firmware functionality is very much involved here, right? For example, do all branches send that event to the host? -- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches