From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Run TXQ teardown code before de-registering interfaces
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 20:41:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tvnycdns.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5B71CD33.7020700@broadcom.com>
Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> writes:
> On 8/13/2018 2:16 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote:
>> The TXQ teardown code can reference the vif data structures that are
>> stored in the netdev private memory area if there are still packets on
>> the queue when it is being freed. Since the TXQ teardown code is run
>> after the netdevs are freed, this can lead to a use-after-free. Fix this
>> by moving the TXQ teardown code to earlier in ieee80211_unregister_hw().
>
> Just off the bat, but from reading the above I am wondering whether
> the use-after-free could also happen upon removing an interface?
Hmm, there doesn't appear to be *any* teardown of TXQs when an interface
is removed...? So I guess that if an interface is removed while it still
has frames on the multicast TXQ, that those packets would be left
hanging there? I don't think there would be an explicit use-after-free,
because they will never get dequeued, so they would just constitute a
memory leak?
Am I missing some automatic mechanism that always empties out queues
before an interface is brought down?
-Toke
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-13 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-13 12:16 [PATCH] mac80211: Run TXQ teardown code before de-registering interfaces Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-08-13 18:25 ` Arend van Spriel
2018-08-13 18:31 ` Ben Greear
2018-08-13 18:41 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tvnycdns.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).