Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
Cc: brcm80211@lists.linux.dev,  linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: brcmfmac: implement basic AP-follow-STA
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:19:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v827k8p2.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zmqf7jCqwlQNGM_j@x1.vandijck-laurijssen.be> (Kurt Van Dijck's message of "Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:29:50 +0200")

Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@vandijck-laurijssen.be> writes:

> /* context */
> We (Yamabiko) have an application where we migrated to a bcm4339 sdio wifi chip.
> We use it in AP+STA mode: when the chip is detected (wlan+ add uevent),
> we call 'run iw dev wlan0 interface add wap0 type __ap' and start
> wpa_supplicant on wlan0 and hostapd on wap0.
> The STA is more important than the AP.
> We have 'roamoff' parameter set. We observed problems with the firmware roaming
> before and switched to wpa_supplicant roaming.
>
> We run a linux v5.4.24 derivative.
>
> /* problem */
> We observed that the chip is able to switch channel for wpa_supplicant to
> connect to a different channel, but it soon looses connection because hostapd
> does not change channel too.
>
> This did work with our previous wifi chip (realtek 88x2 something), which notifies
> hostapd that it switched.
>
> /* patch description */
> I went down and ended up modifying the brcmfmac driver, patch appended below.
> For contributing on these mailing lists, I ported it to yesterday's master.
> The idea is that whenever a STA issues a connect with channel info, the AP's
> will switch to it too. This implies a small glitch in the AP radio, which already
> occurred before my patch. it seems that the wifi chip cannot modify radio settings
> per virtual interface, although the API to the wifi chip suggests it can (that is
> most probable a more generic communication used for other chips that can do this).
> The channel switch is also reported to userspace.
>
> To be less invasive, this new behaviour is put behind
> a module parameter 'ap_follow_sta'.

FWIW module parameters should be avoided, especially for 802.11 protocol
level functionality.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-17 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-13  7:29 brcmfmac: implement basic AP-follow-STA Kurt Van Dijck
2024-06-17 13:19 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2024-06-17 14:57   ` Arend Van Spriel
2024-06-17 17:27   ` Kurt Van Dijck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v827k8p2.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=kvalo@kernel.org \
    --cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=brcm80211@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox