public inbox for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-firmware@kernel.org,  linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com
Subject: Re: putting future iwlwifi firmware into intel/ ?
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:56:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v84gi1v4.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fec30176f437d565d4c1dfc4944373f117d75a64.camel@sipsolutions.net> (Johannes Berg's message of "Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:18:03 +0200")

Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes:

> Since I was just looking at some firmware related thing (files for the
> hardware that might be shared between Intel BT and WiFi), I noticed that
> just over 30% of the files/dirs in the top-level firmware tree are
> iwlwifi-* files.
>
> While we can't move the files that older drivers might consume, we could
> e.g. change the driver to look up future versions/future hardware under
> intel/ instead? Would that be worth doing?

Yes, please. It would be nice to cleanup linux-firmware.git top level
directory. But what about this:

* convert iwlwifi to first use _all_ files under intel/ and then as a
  fallback top level directory

* move existing iwlwifi firmware files to intel/ but create symlinks from
  the old location to the new one (using 'Link:' in WHENCE)

* add new files only to intel/ directory

* after few (4?) years remove the symlinks from linux-firmware and the
  fallback from iwlwifi

This should ensure backwards compatibility, right?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-17 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-17 11:18 putting future iwlwifi firmware into intel/ ? Johannes Berg
2024-04-17 12:31 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-04-17 12:39   ` Johannes Berg
2024-04-17 12:42     ` Mario Limonciello
2024-04-17 12:45       ` Johannes Berg
2024-04-17 13:58         ` Mario Limonciello
2024-04-17 14:09           ` Johannes Berg
2024-04-17 14:14             ` Mario Limonciello
2024-04-17 12:56 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2024-04-17 14:11   ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v84gi1v4.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=kvalo@kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-firmware@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox