Re: [PATCH 4/4] wifi: ath12k: Refactor MAC un/register helper function

[Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>]

Karthikeyan Periyasamy <quic_periyasa@quicinc.com> writes:

>> Is there a reason why you moved these two functions from mac.c to
>> core.c? This is mac level code anyway, right?
>
> This is not fully mac level code, some parts of SoC/chip level code
> bindup in the mac level. So i segregated the SoC level code like ab
> related param initialization handling from the mac level procedure.
>
> Now, mac/radio should take care only radio level handling procedure.
>
> In future for MLO, SoC level can be extend easily.

But is there a concrete reason to have the functions in core.c? In your
following patches I couldn't see why to move these functions to core.c,
everything seems to be suitable for mac.c.

I experimented this in the pending branch and moved the functions to
mac.c (tag ath-pending-202401151424):

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=bee89ac2b5755754849deaf7054828e982cc6658

I also fixed your other patchsets to match that and to me it makes more
sense to have everything in mac.c. I prefer to make core.c as simple as possible.

As you can see I also made changes to the patch titles to make them more
understandable:

wifi: ath12k: refactor ath12k_mac_register() and ath12k_mac_unregister()

Thoughts?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches