From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F3A75D48F for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 13:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FnVf7x6M" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD895C433C8; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 13:51:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1701784304; bh=a6xS3z6mtLFaeTZpe8xIR4gG2cDNZqCLFwl0J9kQ+gI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=FnVf7x6Mtl0mcGs14WSkijPvLJvs2fhCQBobmzk3TbVtdXLcC4RSHyxWCON9d4U4n CJEke4CM9PzzW4VEzOXaf6DR+zUGBduQ2S0axr2tpMq6jBCpT+9qt95zRSlMK5RniM yRy0pELfoAfNTRBIXR7Qd4A6kmrRBrswoYfoXyWQBdadcNAJkQVqhsDFvq2KLpafQJ Hr9FdBCZ2xi+UTSxZsGfw0TAJJtb9HZjjnwVn0LtqtHzfyMUi038vUuQiG8GrW+ikh JT3dTAJOZu8My5LhOuucAfRdHfJJ2hJ27PRMfufLUCmVIwPRhQhtaMW7qJk9zshsQr k530kPwTKSV/Q== Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6D61AFAA56E; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 14:51:42 +0100 (CET) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Hancheng YANG , kvalo@codeaurora.org, Johannes Berg , Jouni Malinen Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: reset survey of current channel after a scan started In-Reply-To: References: <20230817092900.361270-1-hyang@freebox.fr> <87wmxtby1g.fsf@toke.dk> <87v8cutbra.fsf@toke.dk> <87wmx1m2mf.fsf@toke.dk> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2023 14:51:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87v89cahap.fsf@toke.dk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Hancheng YANG writes: > Does anyone has any idea about this issue? I guess there are no complaints about the approach. Please resubmit without the "or there's a better approach?" comment :) -Toke