From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>,
ath12k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: request to include ath.git tree
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 09:09:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wmks50fw.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240807080423.45efb506@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Wed, 7 Aug 2024 08:04:23 +1000")
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:
> Hi Kalle,
>
> On Tue, 06 Aug 2024 18:55:38 +0300 Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> ath.git is a tree for Atheros and Qualcomm Wi-Fi drivers residing under
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/. Jeff and I are the maintainers. Over the
>> years multiple people have been requesting including the tree to
>> linux-next and finally we are biting the bullet.
>>
>> So we are requesting to pull two branches from our ath.git tree to linux-next:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ath/ath.git for-current
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ath/ath.git for-next
>>
>> for-current feeds the wireless tree and for-next feeds the wireless-next
>> tree.
>
> Added from today.
Thanks!
> I have listed just you as a contect, should I list anyone else (or a
> mailing list)?
Please add Jeff and our ath10k list (all our build reports go to the
ath10k list):
Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@kernel.org>
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
>> Because our for-next branch is very active one problem with is that the
>> chances of having conflicts between the branches is high and that would
>> be extra work for you :/ Do you have any suggestions for this? For
>> example, should we create temporary merges for you or something like
>> that? Just for this reason we do try to keep the number of patches going
>> to for-current minimal and only take important fixes.
>
> Well, your for-next branch should only contain patches that are ready
> for integration i.e. reviewed and unit tested, so it should not be all
> that busy. I expect you may also have a development branch for patches
> you are still testing.
Yeah, we do have a separate pending branch which is used for testing and
review.
> Otherwise, you should concentrate on your own tree and I will notify
> you of conflicts (and ask advice if the conflicts are too difficult
> for me to resolve).
Great, that sounds good.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-07 6:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-06 15:55 linux-next: request to include ath.git tree Kalle Valo
2024-08-06 22:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-07 6:09 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2024-08-07 21:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wmks50fw.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=ath12k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).