From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2DF6132804; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 18:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717439393; cv=none; b=gzwqarSgrj82kLq0M690jWVR8HoZdsJOazPJwPkbRfpqk477ReXQi0KcENemIvmnVwwz2Dhd7qRMmuGi3IDHMBN46XDySpbXD5wGvSnFdM3xVphvtUMjOu2lFKjKDFduMobZ6v6T+7qMf7jqEvc8eVDJHbskntfk1n9bwSDjl7I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717439393; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mNhvVNlm7lR5BWW0xTcHRwGUWRDr+XPiKpnaTJtSDTI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=reWDAwotov+xkrZ0wdw74Qk7bMJBlCg8vmnqM7p7YDPxO4z62vJqlGiLOtHTDjIN438CNIbTBLnm8C7n3PEBqssnYBwlQ5Pqil7K/3/YfsSIa9EZHU3FIGzAkVHeH93TjW++S8HPpMsdvKuVi1/bJMgbxnpQzVQubP4iK0ldZ68= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OkZuV1eV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OkZuV1eV" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0ECD0C2BD10; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 18:29:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1717439392; bh=mNhvVNlm7lR5BWW0xTcHRwGUWRDr+XPiKpnaTJtSDTI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=OkZuV1eVes1bmZwBJfIiWe1TuYU2eCulaWhDYbIQ6vzMFyaOAD8QPRxLbAyVHL9wa aOkkSIhSzuJEqQBog1tDRdXeLpG0m/VC1G9Om4eLmdkgUqTbgYBXSXgzzzezGrrF0L c2htHuvtT5if3G7uXQRjvkAhGsd9+9OwRi6wvWjUhRMoTbUvhi610iohydI++HjNHe LpcZh2FSschBweqG/H5aKQNvQCEM8ZB9Ic02r9Fb67jykDi82yuxpgetbw8D0rIp/V GTNZSGBtL1yRhYXTQypgCTgnc+OoLITtnoyQnItFbQw6FK/mcgi80sDmAmWTx7rS0H 9ignmGxUFxgZQ== From: Kalle Valo To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Dan Williams , Dave Jiang , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, Jeff Johnson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [regression] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in lockdep_register_key+0x755/0x8f0 References: <20240603165342.GA685076@bhelgaas> Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 21:29:47 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20240603165342.GA685076@bhelgaas> (Bjorn Helgaas's message of "Mon, 3 Jun 2024 11:53:42 -0500") Message-ID: <87wmn5ubfo.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Bjorn Helgaas writes: > On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 11:39:03AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> Kalle Valo writes: >> >> > Dan Williams writes: >> > >> >> Kalle Valo wrote: >> >> [..] >> >>> >> The proposed fix for that is here: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> http://lore.kernel.org/r/66560aa9dbedb_195e294b0@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch >> >>> > >> >>> > I get "Not Found" from that link, is there a typo? >> >>> >> >>> I found this fix from for-linus branch: >> >>> >> >>> # PCI: Fix missing lockdep annotation for pci_cfg_access_trylock()for-linus >> >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/commit/?h=for-linus&id=f941b9182c54a885a9d5d4cfd97af66873c98560 >> >>> >> >>> But at least that doesn't fix my crash. >> >> >> >> Sorry for the broken link I mistakenly used a message-id from an >> >> internal thread with the intel.com reporter. However, it is moot now >> >> because the new direction is to revert the lockdep infrastructure: >> >> >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/171711745834.1628941.5259278474013108507.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com >> >> >> >> (that link works...) >> > >> > Thanks, that links works :) I did a quick test with the three patches >> > and I didn't see any crashes anymore. But to be confident I need to run >> > overnight tests, I'll provide my Tested-by after that. >> >> Ok, I'm now quite confident that the issues I saw are solved so: >> >> Tested-by: Kalle Valo > > Thanks for reporting the issue and testing the fix! Can you please > respond with your Tested-by to the actual patch(es) you tested? Not easily as I'm not subscribed to linux-pci list and I haven't researched how to import mbox files to my mailer :) So feel free to ignore my Tested-by tag in this case. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches