From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:31077 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752567AbcIIMgB (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:36:01 -0400 From: "Valo, Kalle" To: Martin Blumenstingl CC: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , "ath6kl@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: support for QCA9377 SDIO (ath10k or ath6kl) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 12:35:55 +0000 Message-ID: <87wpilp7x0.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20160909_143604_970652_DE75A8E9) References: In-Reply-To: (Martin Blumenstingl's message of "Thu, 8 Sep 2016 21:31:12 +0200") Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Martin Blumenstingl writes: > is there any support for the SDIO chips QCA9377 (and QCA9378) planned? > Would these be supported by ath10k or ath6kl or is a completely new > driver needed? I'm not familiar with the details of QCA9377 SDIO firmware but I assume ath10k would be the best option for supporting it. We split from the beginning the core code (ath10k_core.ko) and the PCI code (ath10k_pci.ko) to make it easier to add new bus support. --=20 Kalle Valo=