From: "Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"Manoharan, Rajkumar" <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com>,
"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ath10k: fix unconditional num_mpdus_ready subtraction
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 12:46:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wpocb4ur.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73a1d6a04908fe060559d1a6e9afb128@codeaurora.org> (Rajkumar Manoharan's message of "Fri, 01 Apr 2016 10:49:05 +0530")
Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@codeaurora.org> writes:
> On 2016-04-01 00:22, Ben Greear wrote:
>> On 03/30/2016 08:42 AM, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
>>> Decrement num_mpdus_ready only when rx amsdu is processed
>>> successfully.
>>> Not doing so, will result in leak and impact stabilty under low memory
>>> cases.
>>
>> Should this patch be rebased on top of the "ath10k: process htt rx
>> indication as batch mode" patch?
>>
> It should be on top of "ath10k: speedup htt rx descriptor processing
> for rx_ind". Instead of sending next version of original series, i
> sent it as follow up.
Should this commit log have a fixes line like this:
Fixes: 59465fe46ef1 ("ath10k: speedup htt rx descriptor processing for tx completion")
--
Kalle Valo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-05 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-30 15:42 [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: fix calibration init sequence of qca99x0 Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-30 15:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] ath10k: remove unnecessary warning for probe response drops Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-31 16:57 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-01 5:13 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-30 15:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] ath10k: fix unconditional num_mpdus_ready subtraction Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-03-31 18:52 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-01 5:19 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-04-05 12:46 ` Valo, Kalle [this message]
2016-04-05 12:48 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-04-05 13:34 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2016-04-05 12:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: fix calibration init sequence of qca99x0 Valo, Kalle
2016-04-05 13:32 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wpocb4ur.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmanohar@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).