From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.72]:31838 "EHLO sabertooth01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756140AbbJVGej (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2015 02:34:39 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Yan Bellavance CC: "ath6kl-devel@qca.qualcomm.com" , "c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com" , Bartosz Markowski , Janusz Dziedzic , Marek Kwaczynski , Marek Puzyniak , Michal Kazior , "ath6kl@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: QCA6174, is it ath6kl or ath10k? References: Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:34:15 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Yan Bellavance's message of "Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:41:05 +0000") Message-ID: <87wpuf8l94.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20151022_083442_765846_47761DD2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Yan Bellavance writes: > I would like to know if the QCA6174 should be driven by ath6kl driver or > ath10k. I'm working with snapdragon 810 devkit and it looks like it's using > ath6kl based driver but official linux documentation and github point out that > it should be driven by ath10k. What makes you think you should use ath6kl with QCA6174? Please provide details. > Could someone explain to me what are the differences between the two(briefly > and in the context of QCA61x4) and if there are drawbacks to using the ath6kl > one? ath10k and ath6kl are drivers for different chipsets, you cannot just choose with one to use. I don't understand why you think you can choose as you can't. > Why are we not using ath10k driver? With QCA6174 you have to use ath10k. -- Kalle Valo