From: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.L-H@gmx.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ 57/72] genirq: Unmask oneshot irqs when thread was not woken
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:10:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wr6xze0h.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1203062043500.2742@ionos> (Thomas Gleixner's message of "Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:45:21 +0100 (CET)")
Am 06.03.2012 um 20:45 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>> On Monday 05 March 2012, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> > On 2012-02-28 02:05 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>> >
>> > > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>> >
>> > Alas, the commit below broke the WiFi on my laptop, where
>> > "iwlist wlan0 scan" now just reports: " wlan0 No scan results".
>> >
>> > This is not specific to 3.2, the same problem exists in 3.0.23 and
>> > 3.3-rc6 while previous releases worked.
>>
>> I can confirm this regression on an old PIII based notebook with a
>> 32 bit BCM4306/3 PCMCIA card:
>>
>> 02:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Broadcom Corporation BCM4306 802.11b/g Wireless LAN Controller [14e4:4320] (rev 03)
>> Subsystem: Linksys WPC54G v1 / WPC54GS v1 802.11g Wireless-G Notebook Adapter [1737:4320]
>> Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 64, IRQ 10
>> Memory at 20000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K]
>> Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2
>> Kernel driver in use: b43-pci-bridge
>>
>> I can observe these differences in the dmesg output (3.2.9 + current
>> stable queue-3.2):
>>
>> The kernel configuration is identical in both cases, the only
>> difference is "genirq: Unmask oneshot irqs when thread was not woken"
>> being applied or not.
>>
>> --- working <-- 3.2.9 + current stable queue-3.2, with "genirq: Unmask oneshot irqs when thread was not woken" reverted
>> +++ broken <-- 3.2.9 + current stable queue-3.2
>> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ Initializing cgroup subsys freezer
>> Initializing cgroup subsys net_cls
>> Initializing cgroup subsys blkio
>> Initializing cgroup subsys perf_event
>> +CPU serial number disabled.
>
> I can't see why reverting that genirq patch would cause this.
>
>> mce: CPU supports 5 MCE banks
>> SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
>> Freeing SMP alternatives: 8k freed
>> @@ -137,9 +138,16 @@ SMP disabled
>> Performance Events:
>> no APIC, boot with the "lapic" boot parameter to force-enable it.
>> no hardware sampling interrupt available.
>> -Broken PMU hardware detected, using software events only.
>> +p6 PMU driver.
>> +... version: 0
>> +... bit width: 32
>> +... generic registers: 2
>> +... value mask: 00000000ffffffff
>> +... max period: 000000007fffffff
>> +... fixed-purpose events: 0
>> +... event mask: 0000000000000003
>
> Ditto.
>
>> Brought up 1 CPUs
>> Total of 1 processors activated (1989.75 BogoMIPS).
>> devtmpfs: initialized
>> PM: Registering ACPI NVS region at eeff000 (4096 bytes)
>> print_constraints: dummy:
>> @@ -174,12 +182,12 @@ pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 10: [mem 0xec00000
>> type 1 class 0x000604
>> pci 0000:00:01.0: supports D1
>> type 2 class 0x000607
>> -pci 0000:00:04.0: reg 10: [mem 0x10000000-0x10000fff]
>> +pci 0000:00:04.0: reg 10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff]
>
> Even more.
FWIW, I don't see any such differences on my system (with 3.3-rc6).
> There is something extremly fishy.
Cheers,
Sven
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-06 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20120228010511.GA8453@kroah.com>
[not found] ` <20120228010434.412979550@linuxfoundation.org>
[not found] ` <87hay4dqjr.fsf@turtle.gmx.de>
2012-03-04 21:53 ` [ 57/72] genirq: Unmask oneshot irqs when thread was not woken Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-04 22:08 ` Sven Joachim
2012-03-05 0:43 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2012-03-06 0:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-06 8:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-06 9:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-06 19:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-06 19:53 ` Sven Joachim
2012-03-06 20:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-06 20:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-06 21:07 ` Sven Joachim
2012-03-06 21:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-06 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-06 21:08 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2012-03-06 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-06 21:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-06 22:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-06 22:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-06 23:38 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2012-03-07 5:36 ` Sven Joachim
2012-03-06 20:25 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2012-03-06 19:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-06 20:10 ` Sven Joachim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wr6xze0h.fsf@turtle.gmx.de \
--to=svenjoac@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.L-H@gmx.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).