From: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "vivek.natraj\@gmail.com" <vivek.natraj@gmail.com>,
"linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] mac80211: use ps-poll when dynamic power save mode is disabled
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:19:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y6wtlv9z.fsf@litku.valot.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233253941.4067.2.camel@johannes.local> (Johannes Berg's message of "Thu\, 29 Jan 2009 19\:32\:21 +0100")
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes:
> On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 20:15 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
>> > No, I mean in the timeout > 0 case, what vivek mentioned too. We never
>> > go back to sleep unless we send a packet.
>>
>> First of all, this patchset doesn't change the logic for timeout > 0
>> case. But that case was working already earlier, here's my analysis:
>>
>> 1. tim bit is set
>> 2. if timeout > 0 disable power save and send null frame
>> 3. null frame enables dynamic_ps_timer in ieee80211_master_start_xmit()
>> 4. after dynamic_ps_timer triggers, power save is enabled again
>>
>> I understood that this was the reason why Vivek moved the running of
>> dynamic_ps_timer from subif to the master interface. Or did I miss
>> something?
>
> Hah, no, you're right, sorry, I got confused.
It confused me also. I would prefer to have the dynamic_ps_timer stuff
in subif and have an explicit timer for the null frames, just to avoid
confusion. I'll try to see if I can come up with a patch later on.
--
Kalle Valo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-29 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-22 11:45 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] mac80211: ps-poll implementation Kalle Valo
2009-01-22 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] mac80211: remove multicast check from check_tim() Kalle Valo
2009-01-28 14:59 ` Vivek Natarajan
2009-01-28 16:06 ` Kalle Valo
2009-01-22 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] mac80211: use ps-poll when dynamic power save mode is disabled Kalle Valo
2009-01-22 17:02 ` Johannes Berg
2009-01-28 16:49 ` Kalle Valo
2009-01-28 18:52 ` Johannes Berg
2009-01-29 18:15 ` Kalle Valo
2009-01-29 18:32 ` Johannes Berg
2009-01-29 20:19 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2009-01-23 23:28 ` Tomas Winkler
2009-01-28 8:39 ` Kalle Valo
2009-01-28 11:46 ` Tomas Winkler
2009-01-28 12:33 ` Kalle Valo
2009-01-28 13:00 ` Johannes Berg
2009-01-28 13:26 ` Tomas Winkler
2009-01-28 13:36 ` Johannes Berg
2009-01-22 13:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] mac80211: ps-poll implementation Johannes Berg
2009-01-23 9:31 ` Kalle Valo
2009-01-23 22:11 ` Johannes Berg
2009-01-28 16:40 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y6wtlv9z.fsf@litku.valot.fi \
--to=kalle.valo@iki.fi \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivek.natraj@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).