linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>,
	ath10k@lists.infradead.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: Set sk_pacing_shift to 6 for 11AC WiFi chips
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 13:45:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zhye1aqg.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532589677-16428-3-git-send-email-wgong@codeaurora.org>

Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org> writes:

> Upstream kernel has an interface to help adjust sk_pacing_shift to help
> improve TCP UL throughput.
> The sk_pacing_shift is 8 in mac80211, this is based on test with 11N
> WiFi chips with ath9k. For QCA6174/QCA9377 PCI 11AC chips, the 11AC
> VHT80 TCP UL throughput testing result shows 6 is the optimal.
> Overwrite the sk_pacing_shift to 6 in ath10k driver.

When I tested this, a pacing shift of 8 was quite close to optimal as
well for ath10k. Why are you getting different results?

> Tested with QCA6174 PCI with firmware
> WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00109-QCARMSWPZ-1, but this will also affect QCA9377 PCI.
> It's not a regression with new firmware releases.
>
> There have 2 test result of different settings:
>
> ARM CPU based device with QCA6174A PCI with different
> sk_pacing_shift:
>
>  sk_pacing_shift  throughput(Mbps)             CPU utilization
>          6            500(-P5)      ~75% idle, Focus on CPU1: ~14%idle
>          7            454(-P5)      ~80% idle, Focus on CPU1: ~4%idle
>          8               288        ~90% idle, Focus on CPU1: ~35%idle
>          9              ~200        ~92% idle, Focus on CPU1: ~50%idle

Your tests do not include latency values; please try running a test that
also measures latency. The tcp_nup test in Flent (https://flent.org)
will do that, for instance. Also, is this a single TCP flow?

-Toke

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-26 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-26  7:21 [PATCH 0/2] Change sk_pacing_shift in ieee80211_hw for best tx throughput Wen Gong
2018-07-26  7:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: Save sk_pacing_shift to ieee80211_hw Wen Gong
2018-07-26 14:52   ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-27  8:35     ` Wen Gong
2018-07-27  9:30       ` Kalle Valo
2018-07-26  7:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: Set sk_pacing_shift to 6 for 11AC WiFi chips Wen Gong
2018-07-26 11:45   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2018-07-26 13:02     ` Michał Kazior
2018-07-27  9:39       ` Wen Gong
2018-07-27 12:33         ` Michał Kazior
2018-07-27  9:29     ` Wen Gong
2018-07-27 20:06       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-07-26  7:16 [PATCH 0/2] Change sk_pacing_shift in ieee80211_hw for best tx throughput Wen Gong
2018-07-26  7:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: Set sk_pacing_shift to 6 for 11AC WiFi chips Wen Gong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zhye1aqg.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@toke.dk \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wgong@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).