From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>,
ath10k@lists.infradead.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: Set sk_pacing_shift to 6 for 11AC WiFi chips
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 13:45:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zhye1aqg.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532589677-16428-3-git-send-email-wgong@codeaurora.org>
Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org> writes:
> Upstream kernel has an interface to help adjust sk_pacing_shift to help
> improve TCP UL throughput.
> The sk_pacing_shift is 8 in mac80211, this is based on test with 11N
> WiFi chips with ath9k. For QCA6174/QCA9377 PCI 11AC chips, the 11AC
> VHT80 TCP UL throughput testing result shows 6 is the optimal.
> Overwrite the sk_pacing_shift to 6 in ath10k driver.
When I tested this, a pacing shift of 8 was quite close to optimal as
well for ath10k. Why are you getting different results?
> Tested with QCA6174 PCI with firmware
> WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00109-QCARMSWPZ-1, but this will also affect QCA9377 PCI.
> It's not a regression with new firmware releases.
>
> There have 2 test result of different settings:
>
> ARM CPU based device with QCA6174A PCI with different
> sk_pacing_shift:
>
> sk_pacing_shift throughput(Mbps) CPU utilization
> 6 500(-P5) ~75% idle, Focus on CPU1: ~14%idle
> 7 454(-P5) ~80% idle, Focus on CPU1: ~4%idle
> 8 288 ~90% idle, Focus on CPU1: ~35%idle
> 9 ~200 ~92% idle, Focus on CPU1: ~50%idle
Your tests do not include latency values; please try running a test that
also measures latency. The tcp_nup test in Flent (https://flent.org)
will do that, for instance. Also, is this a single TCP flow?
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-26 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-26 7:21 [PATCH 0/2] Change sk_pacing_shift in ieee80211_hw for best tx throughput Wen Gong
2018-07-26 7:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: Save sk_pacing_shift to ieee80211_hw Wen Gong
2018-07-26 14:52 ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-27 8:35 ` Wen Gong
2018-07-27 9:30 ` Kalle Valo
2018-07-26 7:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: Set sk_pacing_shift to 6 for 11AC WiFi chips Wen Gong
2018-07-26 11:45 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2018-07-26 13:02 ` Michał Kazior
2018-07-27 9:39 ` Wen Gong
2018-07-27 12:33 ` Michał Kazior
2018-07-27 9:29 ` Wen Gong
2018-07-27 20:06 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-07-26 7:16 [PATCH 0/2] Change sk_pacing_shift in ieee80211_hw for best tx throughput Wen Gong
2018-07-26 7:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: Set sk_pacing_shift to 6 for 11AC WiFi chips Wen Gong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zhye1aqg.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wgong@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).