From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13807ECAAD5 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 14:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229486AbiH2OwW (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 10:52:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33116 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229635AbiH2OwU (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 10:52:20 -0400 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:4433::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21C9692F6B for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 07:52:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=Z/vg02kKTtdlcV1MPITs8XtFsLXNA/LxUXsG2vgSKYA=; t=1661784739; x=1662994339; b=IqEUyRIC9FSfRKGMwpZIFLoM7I6r243AddbkY5QKlnNZqdj YsSy4GwmjvNTuo/NMWfwQI3xiY9eY6S1pNM12lf6txAvxM9q+5DURITCRnEmArq3l+eZLiMAPKZ6D IgzBRirDcyT/4QiC0NGPnDvC3TIlJwdJdRMbBBeI+b7ec3TaylJ+VYaC6qJr9MoJBipGTujiFy8AJ wKLp1PRcn7drDOTqptgYCR4M/CsAs+wgsL0gTbuFkYQ5mBydeWi5EqOQS6P1tnGuo39LFX9FITJpn lrNoEAp3S3utj3uAzxuCtOIRF6uMqeMe0ZbGrHHE8wYZV7iz6qfc8+j5S07YYxgw==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oSg7c-002pnW-20; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 16:52:16 +0200 Message-ID: <8867d4a7552fc036da51ef5451ead1fd4df7f139.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] mac80211: add TPC support in control path From: Johannes Berg To: Thomas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=FChn?= Cc: Jonas Jelonek , linux-wireless , "nbd@nbd.name" Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 16:52:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5AA24131-A7E9-451D-97AB-97D925B2A53A@hs-nordhausen.de> References: <20220829144147.484787-1-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com> <5175b7f95442eff1f8e899feee3d3aeb330fb61e.camel@sipsolutions.net> <5AA24131-A7E9-451D-97AB-97D925B2A53A@hs-nordhausen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.4 (3.44.4-1.fc36) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2022-08-29 at 16:51 +0200, Thomas H=C3=BChn wrote: > > >=20 > > > Compile-Tested: current wireless-next tree with all flags on > > > Tested-on PCEngines APU with ath9k WiFi device on OpenWrt Linux > > > Kernel 5.10.137 > > >=20 > >=20 > > That seems just a little old? Not sure I'd trust that given the major > > changes in the tree recently? >=20 > Good point, we can test this with 5.15.63 by enabling the OpenWrt testing= kernel =E2=80=A6 would that be ok ? >=20 Well a lot of major changes just happened 5.19 -> 6.0, so something more recent would be better? johannes