From: "Luka Gejak" <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
To: "Huihui Huang" <hhhuang@smu.edu.sg>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Huihui Huang" <hhhuang@smu.edu.sg>, "Ping-Ke Shih" <pkshih@realtek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rtw-next v2 2/2] wifi: rtw88: check the C2H payload length before reading it
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2026 09:05:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <89b76c1edf151f509a912f887d9fe0b93cc9e19c@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261031175621.2228762-3-hhhuang@smu.edu.sg>
Hi Huihui,
Thanks for the v2. One comment below.
October 31, 2026 at 6:56 PM, "Huihui Huang" <hhhuang@smu.edu.sg> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
> index 0a909bf79cf5..6bc684726669 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2381,6 +2386,9 @@ void rtw_hw_scan_status_report(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (!test_bit(RTW_FLAG_SCANNING, rtwdev->flags))
> return;
>
> + if (rtw_c2h_payload_len(skb) < 3)
> + return;
> +
As far as I can see, apart from the abort paths this report is the only
thing that completes a hw scan. So, a short report now leaves the scan
pending. RTW_FLAG_SCANNING stays set, scanning_vif is never cleared,
and I couldn't find anything in rtw88 that times the scan out.
Until something cancels it, e.g. a disconnect or the interface going
down, every new scan then fails with -EBUSY, since the old request is
still pending.
Before this patch the scan still completed, only with a return code read
past skb->len. Maybe it is better to complete it as aborted here instead
of dropping the report, something like:
if (rtw_c2h_payload_len(skb) < 3) {
rtw_hw_scan_complete(rtwdev, vif, true);
return;
}
Best regards,
Luka Gejak
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-31 17:56 [PATCH rtw-next v2 0/2] wifi: rtw88: check C2H header and payload lengths Huihui Huang
2026-10-31 17:56 ` [PATCH rtw-next v2 1/2] wifi: rtw88: drop C2H packets shorter than the C2H header Huihui Huang
2026-11-02 9:10 ` Luka Gejak
2026-10-31 17:56 ` [PATCH rtw-next v2 2/2] wifi: rtw88: check the C2H payload length before reading it Huihui Huang
2026-11-02 9:05 ` Luka Gejak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=89b76c1edf151f509a912f887d9fe0b93cc9e19c@linux.dev \
--to=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--cc=hhhuang@smu.edu.sg \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox