From: asinghal@codeaurora.org
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Kiran Kumar Lokere <klokere@codeaurora.org>,
jjohnson@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cfg80211: Modify wiphy registration semantics for self managed hints
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:10:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8dab316b358495f85821474540af4532@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1524150429.3024.24.camel@sipsolutions.net>
hi Johannes,
replies inline:
On 2018-04-19 08:07, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-04-13 at 13:32 -0700, asinghal@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> hi Johannes,
>> please fine some replies inline:
>>
>> On 2018-03-21 03:15, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> > So I really think this should just be one patch - it's not about
>> > "registration semantics" but about which types of requests get passed
>> > to reg_notifier(), and if you do it in one place you'd better also do
>> > it in the other.
>>
>> Sure, I have combined the two patches in one patch now:
>
> So now you should probably resend it properly, with a new subject that
> explains it better? Just "modify" doesn't really seem all that
> appropriate - what's the modification?
>
> Patchwork also lost half the patch for some reason, probably you
> copy/pasted it and lost some whitespace at an empty line.
>
We have posted a new patch-set with better commit title and message.
>> Call the regulatory notifier for self managed hints only if
>> initiator is NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_USER and hint type is
>> NL80211_USER_REG_HINT_CELL_BASE. Also call regulatory
>> notifier when wiphy is registered under similar conditions.
>
> I guess this should say why.
>
>> list_for_each_entry(rdev, &cfg80211_rdev_list, list) {
>> wiphy = &rdev->wiphy;
>> - if (wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_WIPHY_SELF_MANAGED)
>> + if (wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_WIPHY_SELF_MANAGED) {
>> self_managed_found = true;
>> - else
>> - return false;
>> + if (request->initiator == NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_USER &&
>> + request->user_reg_hint_type ==
>> + NL80211_USER_REG_HINT_CELL_BASE)
>> + reg_call_notifier(wiphy, request);
>> + } else {
>> + self_managed_found = false;
>> + }
>> }
>
> This is awkward now - how about
>
> self_managed_found = regulatory_flags & SELF_MANAGED;
> if (self_managed_found &&
> request->initiator == ... &&
> ...)
> reg_call_notifier(...)
This has been addressed in the new patch with a separate notify
function.
>
>
>> @@ -3700,15 +3705,21 @@ void wiphy_regulatory_register(struct wiphy
>> *wiphy)
>> {
>> struct regulatory_request *lr;
>>
>> - /* self-managed devices ignore external hints */
>> - if (wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_WIPHY_SELF_MANAGED)
>> + lr = get_last_request();
>> +
>> + /* self-managed devices ignore beacon hints and 11d IE */
>> + if (wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_WIPHY_SELF_MANAGED) {
>> wiphy->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS |
>> - REGULATORY_COUNTRY_IE_IGNORE;
>> + REGULATORY_COUNTRY_IE_IGNORE;
>
> no need to change the indentation here
has been addressed in new patch.
thanks,
amar
>
> johannes
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-30 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-03 19:40 [PATCH 1/2] cfg80211: Enhance semantics for self-managed hints Jouni Malinen
2018-03-03 19:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] cfg80211: Modify wiphy registration semantics for self managed hints Jouni Malinen
2018-03-21 10:15 ` Johannes Berg
2018-04-13 20:32 ` asinghal
2018-04-19 15:07 ` Johannes Berg
2018-04-30 22:10 ` asinghal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8dab316b358495f85821474540af4532@codeaurora.org \
--to=asinghal@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jjohnson@codeaurora.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=jouni@codeaurora.org \
--cc=klokere@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).