From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com.tw (rtits2.realtek.com [211.75.126.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 649FD2CCC5; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 01:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=211.75.126.72 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781488512; cv=none; b=kJXsUo82E9Udd5puaJjeh7/cENN2vRkLWQzeJt6AuTAA3cOPtFNz4Y/GS0S2szgLYhxje/KAeiLMuwudCCc76WfD551IbzPHZzUtSa2abCMDUulpxoKKSyRW6bP3rIhevSCTNxtiyrQEhvwtSJBUfYAmSCvx1k2Aa4rLS/TT3kU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781488512; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pfYtKVRrgMH7lIX8B9Mg/Z677wGRoDxJcKMb61N2YKI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=nKq38DztS8xVnPl8yD5vsRn+q27NajRjhTXLc85RxfhqlhtkzzveWLj4XwDwnTga3Au/SKdKw9EMHhrjUyQRvnQFevMsPv/rlhbjJKcZqUEUiTHbgBepRKTNkrL8ejJjX3iEXJY9X0YkSS4OsUoudbB1PGrxgV8MrgRk5p682E0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=realtek.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=realtek.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=realtek.com header.i=@realtek.com header.b=dMHrEQ8+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=211.75.126.72 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=realtek.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=realtek.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=realtek.com header.i=@realtek.com header.b="dMHrEQ8+" X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.80 with qID 65F1styyF401899, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=realtek.com; s=dkim; t=1781488495; bh=pfYtKVRrgMH7lIX8B9Mg/Z677wGRoDxJcKMb61N2YKI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=dMHrEQ8+cTW9/Sww/8fez3VfhddS+fFJR2eeLFLYbpoZmx/Sfe+Xq831UdlOwtsYy 8WfJljkAw3/DeJYUqHhVLKZwr8+DkOya9TIFMyVNhqb+/vgQ3tcWuuaTR9t/EH8Z0u 5s1HOBDqkjF9+KszqZTOwCuaENLEsETgqLGZxf5bYIG2Auif5SuOjlkS+zH5qMPfKh uG0Y1m3XN1Q/ry76BZlIgtU6WPtDH4MDw3u2iGx5oGCDCIKlDGLkCvFhTWzFTe49bW Uh+C8fNeG3P93QUUiVz5hMV5Jj2VPeOJWLTDcVOeRrqwE0cqyX6h73Ax4vuQUC/PxC FSSAuus5jsLHg== Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtkexhmbs03.realtek.com.tw[10.21.1.53]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/3.29/5.94) with ESMTPS id 65F1styyF401899 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:54:55 +0800 Received: from RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw (10.21.1.56) by RTKEXHMBS03.realtek.com.tw (10.21.1.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.17; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:54:55 +0800 Received: from RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw ([::1]) by RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::e6fd:5a3f:8946:92c4%10]) with mapi id 15.02.2562.017; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:54:55 +0800 From: Ping-Ke Shih To: Chen Jung Ku CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Chen Jung Ku Subject: RE: [PATCH] wifi: realtek: rtw8822c: replace msleep() with fsleep() for DPK delays Thread-Topic: [PATCH] wifi: realtek: rtw8822c: replace msleep() with fsleep() for DPK delays Thread-Index: AQHc+1bXUI9lQ3CMLU216yjwQVY3JbY+x5IggAAVGvA= Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 01:54:55 +0000 Message-ID: <8e0121a2437547dd812ded7f5ee4e4f7@realtek.com> References: <20260613170434.23645-1-ku.loong@gapp.nthu.edu.tw> <5183c87219e2489eb99c9015cb96a7f8@realtek.com> In-Reply-To: <5183c87219e2489eb99c9015cb96a7f8@realtek.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-TW Content-Language: zh-TW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Ping-Ke Shih wrote: > Chen Jung Ku wrote: > > Replace msleep() with fsleep(), because msleep() may oversleep > > to as much as 20 ms when used for a 10 ms delay. > > According to the kernel documentation, fsleep() is more suitable > > and aligns better with modern kernel style. > > > > Documentation link: https://docs.kernel.org/timers/delay_sleep_function= s.html > > > > Signed-off-by: Chen Jung Ku >=20 > Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih >=20 Oops. The subject prefix should be "wifi: rtw88: ..." I'll correct subject as below during getting merged: wifi: rtw88: 8822c: replace msleep() with fsleep() for DPK delays