From: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nl80211: change validation of scheduled scan interval values
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:12:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fa76f2c-44b2-9782-8636-09afd1d59927@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479810126-28492-1-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
On 22-11-2016 11:22, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> When user-space does not provide scheduled scan plans, ie. uses the
> old scheduled scan API containing NL80211_ATTR_SCHED_SCAN_INTERVAL.
> The interval value passed by user-space is validated against
> struct wiphy::max_sched_scan_plan_interval and if it is exceeding
> it the interval is set to struct wiphy::max_sched_scan_plan_interval.
> However, when the driver does not set this limit the interval the
> interval in the request will always be zero. Hence add a check to
> see whether the driver set struct wiphy::max_sched_scan_plan_interval.
>
> For the new API, ie. for scheduled scan plans, the interval validation
> has been simalarly adjusted to assure the limit is non-zero.
Actually turns out that max_sched_scan_plan_interval is always set in
wiphy_new_nm() which is used by all drivers so please drop this patch.
Regards,
Arend
> Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
> ---
> net/wireless/nl80211.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
> index 24ab199..e621554 100644
> --- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c
> +++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
> @@ -6777,7 +6777,8 @@ static int nl80211_abort_scan(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> if (!request->scan_plans[0].interval)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (request->scan_plans[0].interval >
> + if (wiphy->max_sched_scan_plan_interval &&
> + request->scan_plans[0].interval >
> wiphy->max_sched_scan_plan_interval)
> request->scan_plans[0].interval =
> wiphy->max_sched_scan_plan_interval;
> @@ -6801,7 +6802,10 @@ static int nl80211_abort_scan(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>
> request->scan_plans[i].interval =
> nla_get_u32(plan[NL80211_SCHED_SCAN_PLAN_INTERVAL]);
> - if (!request->scan_plans[i].interval ||
> + if (!request->scan_plans[i].interval)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (wiphy->max_sched_scan_plan_interval &&
> request->scan_plans[i].interval >
> wiphy->max_sched_scan_plan_interval)
> return -EINVAL;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-22 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-22 10:22 [PATCH] nl80211: change validation of scheduled scan interval values Arend van Spriel
2016-11-22 13:12 ` Arend Van Spriel [this message]
2016-11-22 13:17 ` Luca Coelho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9fa76f2c-44b2-9782-8636-09afd1d59927@broadcom.com \
--to=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox