From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Cc: lrodriguez@atheros.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linville@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ath9k: fix dma sync in rx path
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 23:27:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikVkBdTopPJlU2lGkafLIkiiviUHe8J-lTy67y9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BED5E08.3050000@openwrt.org>
2010/5/14 Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>:
> On 2010-05-14 3:16 PM, tom.leiming@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
>>
>> If buffer is to be accessed by cpu after dma transfer is over, but
>> between dma mapping and dma unmapping, we should use
>> dma_sync_single_for_cpu to sync the buffer between cpu with
>> device. And dma_sync_single_for_device is used to let
>> device gain the buffer again.
> I think this patch is wrong. On most MIPS devices,
> dma_sync_single_for_cpu is a no-op. In fact, with this patch, the rx
> path fails very quickly.
Sorry for my bad email client.
On most MIPS devices, dma_sync_single_for_cpu does same things
almost with dma_unmap_single(plat_unmap_dma_mem is no-op). If
dma_unmap_single is enough, dma_sync_single_for_cpu is certainly
enough,
isn't it?
For the usage of dma_sync_single_for_cpu or dma_sync_single_for_device,
Documentation/DMA-API*.txt give more details.
> I believe keeping the dma_sync_single_for_device variant is necessary
> for all syncs.
Thanks,
--
Lei Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-14 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-14 13:15 [PATCH 1/2] ath9k: fix dma direction for map/unmap in ath_rx_tasklet tom.leiming
2010-05-14 13:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] ath9k: fix dma sync in rx path tom.leiming
2010-05-14 14:28 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-05-14 15:27 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2010-05-14 16:19 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-05-15 1:31 ` Ming Lei
2010-05-15 9:25 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-05-15 9:52 ` Ming Lei
2010-05-15 10:25 ` Ming Lei
2010-05-15 10:44 ` Felix Fietkau
2010-05-27 13:51 ` Felix Fietkau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTikVkBdTopPJlU2lGkafLIkiiviUHe8J-lTy67y9@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).