From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181]:62022 "EHLO
	mail-qy0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751369Ab0LIJBB convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 9 Dec 2010 04:01:01 -0500
Received: by qyk12 with SMTP id 12so1711057qyk.19
        for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:01:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20101209013003.GB2243@broadcom.com>
References: <20101020004743.GB31965@kroah.com>
	<20101020005546.GL10832@broadcom.com>
	<20101020010320.GA370@kroah.com>
	<20101021170810.GA15357@broadcom.com>
	<1288621739.26983.32.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
	<20101208205000.GA30861@broadcom.com>
	<AANLkTin70oBFYq8LMJYw6zc7oVF9-UXv=nn_ophx+L2S@mail.gmail.com>
	<20101208222349.GA31641@kroah.com>
	<20101208233527.GA2148@broadcom.com>
	<AANLkTimXjLCLwznMDzT-KdX1qfHvdbpNpJPcNpmuZkOS@mail.gmail.com>
	<20101209013003.GB2243@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:01:00 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimtSdpD0Tu+eKBBWEbBFn2-XmrMaq_c0G4VbX=f@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] linux-firmware: brcm: Removed codeversion from
 firmware filenames.
From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
To: Henry Ptasinski <henryp@broadcom.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
	Brett Rudley <brudley@broadcom.com>,
	"grundler@google.com" <grundler@google.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Roland Vossen <rvossen@broadcom.com>,
	Dowan Kim <dowan@broadcom.com>,
	Arend Van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>,
	"dcbw@redhat.com" <dcbw@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

W dniu 9 grudnia 2010 02:30 użytkownik Henry Ptasinski
<henryp@broadcom.com> napisał:
> Yes, I omitted the earlier part since those comments were not directly about
> the existing Broadcom license.   But to be complete:

Yes, this part explained why I mentioned distos problems.


> Obviously that's taking some time,
> and I don't have any resolution yet, but I'll keep working on it.

Great, thanks :)

-- 
Rafał