From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:35228 "EHLO mail-ww0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757700Ab0FURMH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:12:07 -0400 Received: by wwb13 with SMTP id 13so663910wwb.19 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:12:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <93781E992CBA7843962D8B0E7D683F3C1172BD0B6D@SC1EXMB-MBCL.global.atheros.com> References: <1274856569-13436-1-git-send-email-emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> <20100618184257.GB6282@tuxdriver.com> <93781E992CBA7843962D8B0E7D683F3C1172BD0B6D@SC1EXMB-MBCL.global.atheros.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:12:04 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: wireless-regdb: Add A band in IL - And general point regarding tx power limits in the dbase From: Emmanuel Grumbach To: Michael Green Cc: "John W. Linville" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , David Quan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 17:51, Michael Green wrote: > Here are my comments on the proposed patch... > > country IL: >> >       (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20) >> > +     (5150 - 5250 @ 40). (N/A, 200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR >> > +     (5250 - 5350 @ 40). (N/A, 200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS > > b) I think all entries in the dbase should be in dBm (not mW).   dBm vs. mW are absolutely equivalent. No reason to retain "mW" unit from the source docs.  I think this was agreed by all before, but wanted to reiterate. Can you please help me translation from mW to db ? Thanks