From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:58950 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932531Ab1ERA2n convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2011 20:28:43 -0400 Received: by iyb14 with SMTP id 14so866224iyb.19 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:28:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1305677203-16660-2-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> References: <1305677203-16660-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <1305677203-16660-2-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> From: Julian Calaby Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 10:28:23 +1000 Message-ID: (sfid-20110518_022847_591803_9FFF4B3D) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] b43: add bus device abstraction layer To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rafa=B3_Mi=B3ecki?= Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , b43-dev@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Rafał, A quick question: 2011/5/18 Rafał Miłecki : > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki > --- >  drivers/net/wireless/b43/Makefile |    1 + >  drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h    |    4 +++- >  drivers/net/wireless/b43/bus.c    |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Would it make more sense to have this be called ssb.c as it contains all the ssb specific functions, that way you can then have an brcma.c file to contain the functions specific to that bus? Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/