From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Straube <straube.linux@gmail.com>,
Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>,
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>,
Hans de Goede <johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] wifi: rtw88: preparations for RTL8723B/RTL8723BS
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2026 08:00:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C16E411D-37A6-484C-80ED-593AA5596A1B@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44120736-F50E-4AD0-A380-3CEBB6A2F7F4@linux.dev>
On August 22, 2026 6:51:59 PM GMT+02:00, Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev> wrote:
>On August 20, 2026 11:04:06 AM GMT+02:00, luka.gejak@linux.dev wrote:
>>From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
>>
>>This is the first of two series adding support for the Realtek RTL8723B
...
>Nothing in this series changes. The rate is about one in 9200 wakes.
>
>Best regards,
>Luka Gejak
Follow up to the previous email:
The soak has run on since that mail. Over 110557 wakes there is now one
poll 3, still no poll 4, and four failures:
poll0=158 poll1=110557 poll2=35 poll3=1 poll4=0 fails=4
So failures outnumber poll 3 successes, which makes the point stronger,
not weaker. The rate is about 1 in 27600 wakes rather than the 1 in
9200, which I quoted from the smaller sample.
Best regards,
Luka Gejak
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-23 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 9:04 [PATCH v7 0/6] wifi: rtw88: preparations for RTL8723B/RTL8723BS luka.gejak
2026-08-20 9:04 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] wifi: rtw88: add the RTL8723B chip type and SDIO helper luka.gejak
2026-08-20 9:04 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] wifi: rtw88: rx: mark zero length packets on RTL8723BS luka.gejak
2026-08-20 9:04 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] wifi: rtw88: tx: extend the TX report purge timeout to RTL8723BS luka.gejak
2026-08-20 9:04 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] wifi: rtw88: sdio: track free TX pages and OQT credits for RTL8723BS luka.gejak
2026-08-25 6:12 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-08-25 7:20 ` Luka Gejak
2026-08-25 7:25 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-08-25 7:33 ` Luka Gejak
2026-08-25 7:50 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-08-25 8:07 ` Luka Gejak
2026-08-25 8:22 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-08-25 8:32 ` Luka Gejak
2026-08-25 8:38 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-08-25 8:42 ` Luka Gejak
2026-08-25 8:49 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-08-20 9:04 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] wifi: rtw88: sdio: set up RX aggregation and interrupts " luka.gejak
2026-08-20 9:04 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] wifi: rtw88: sdio: add TX back-pressure and retry on page starvation luka.gejak
2026-08-25 6:36 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-08-25 7:22 ` Luka Gejak
2026-08-25 8:27 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-08-22 16:51 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] wifi: rtw88: preparations for RTL8723B/RTL8723BS Luka Gejak
2026-08-23 6:00 ` Luka Gejak [this message]
2026-08-25 7:08 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-08-25 7:27 ` Luka Gejak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C16E411D-37A6-484C-80ED-593AA5596A1B@linux.dev \
--to=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--cc=johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbrobinson@gmail.com \
--cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com \
--cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox