public inbox for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: LB F <goainwo@gmail.com>
To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] wifi: rtw88: Hard system freeze on RTL8821CE when power_save is enabled (LPS/ASPM conflict)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 02:22:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALdGYqS-wYLsH8zuW-Kbd6OqEuwXOaBWLTupMD8tpekagj=jjA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALdGYqQ3tS_aQpmf7xLkaCG9W55ATQXP=tnRNdjBAG8waqg8yA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ping-Ke,

I successfully collected the output with your diagnostic printk.

Here is the exact log entry triggered when the warning fires:

[  180.424146] VHT NSS=0 pkt_stat->rate=0x65 rx_status->band=1
rx_status->rate_idx=0
[  180.424157] WARNING: net/mac80211/rx.c:5491 at
ieee80211_rx_list+0x177/0x1020 [mac80211]

Looking at the rtw88 source code, this perfectly explains why `nss` is 0:
1. The hardware/firmware reports `pkt_stat->rate = 0x65` (101 in decimal).
2. `rtw_rx_fill_rx_status()` checks if `pkt_stat->rate >=
DESC_RATEVHT1SS_MCS0` (which is `0x2c`). Since `0x65 >= 0x2c`, it
correctly sets `rx_status->encoding = RX_ENC_VHT`.
3. It then calls `rtw_desc_to_mcsrate(pkt_stat->rate,
&rx_status->rate_idx, &rx_status->nss)`.
4. Inside `rtw_desc_to_mcsrate()`, the value `0x65` falls completely
outside any known bounds. The highest defined rate in `enum
rtw_trx_desc_rate` is `DESC_RATEVHT4SS_MCS9` (`0x53`). The HT range
(`DESC_RATEMCS0` to `DESC_RATEMCS31`) ends at `0x2b`.
5. Because `0x65` matches absolutely none of the `if/else` brackets in
`rtw_desc_to_mcsrate()`, the function simply returns without mutating
`mcs` and `nss`.
6. Since `rx_status` was initialized with `memset(rx_status, 0, ...)`
at the beginning of the function, `rx_status->nss` remains `0`.

So mac80211 complains because the rtw88 driver doesn't know what rate
`0x65` means, leaves NSS at 0, but still flags it as a VHT packet.

Any idea what `0x65` represents from the hardware's perspective? Is it
a firmware bug or a proprietary control/management frame rate index?

Looking forward to your thoughts!

Best regards,
Oleksandr

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-19  0:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-09 21:48 [BUG] wifi: rtw88: Hard system freeze on RTL8821CE when power_save is enabled (LPS/ASPM conflict) LB F
2026-03-10  2:02 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-10 11:01   ` LB F
2026-03-10 15:12     ` LB F
2026-03-11  2:20       ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-11  2:15     ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-11  2:22       ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-11 11:00         ` LB F
2026-03-11 15:22           ` LB F
2026-03-12  1:56             ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-12 21:42               ` LB F
2026-03-13  0:03                 ` LB F
2026-03-13  0:29                   ` LB F
2026-03-14 10:52                     ` LB F
2026-03-14 12:39                       ` LB F
2026-03-15  0:24                         ` LB F
2026-03-16  2:55                           ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-16 20:27                             ` LB F
2026-03-17  1:28                               ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-18  0:00                                 ` LB F
2026-03-18  0:58                                   ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-18 23:55                                     ` LB F
2026-03-19  0:22                                       ` LB F [this message]
2026-03-19  0:49                                         ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-19  1:24                                       ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-19 23:58                                         ` LB F
2026-03-20  0:41                                           ` LB F
2026-03-20  1:00                                             ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-20  1:19                                               ` LB F
2026-03-20  2:02                                                 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-21 12:07                                                   ` LB F
2026-03-23  2:01                                                     ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-25 20:38                                                       ` LB F
2026-03-16  2:50                         ` Ping-Ke Shih

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALdGYqS-wYLsH8zuW-Kbd6OqEuwXOaBWLTupMD8tpekagj=jjA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=goainwo@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox