From: LB F <goainwo@gmail.com>
To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] wifi: rtw88: Hard system freeze on RTL8821CE when power_save is enabled (LPS/ASPM conflict)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 22:27:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALdGYqSMUPnPfW-_q1RgYr0_SjoXUejAaJJr-o+jpwCk1S7ndQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1bd495ffe57c47eb827eec084729afa2@realtek.com>
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote:
> Not sure if this is because PCIE bridge has no ASPM capability?
That could indeed be the case -- I do not have a way to confirm
without further hardware-level inspection.
> LN5491 (kernel v6.19.6) is:
> case RX_ENC_VHT:
> if (WARN_ONCE(status->rate_idx > 11 ||
> !status->nss ||
> status->nss > 8,
> "Rate marked as a VHT rate but data is invalid: MCS: %d, NSS: %d\n",
> status->rate_idx, status->nss))
> goto drop;
> break;
> Looks like driver reports improper VHT nss/rate? But this warns once, and
> you message isn't like this.
> Could you check the source code LN5491 you are using?
The file net/mac80211/rx.c is not available on disk on my system
(CachyOS ships only .h files in the headers package), but I located
the exact warning message in journalctl:
Rate marked as a VHT rate but data is invalid: MCS: 0, NSS: 0
This confirms that line 5491 in my kernel matches exactly what you
showed from v6.19.6 -- the RX_ENC_VHT case checking for
status->nss == 0. The offset in my trace is slightly different
(+0x183 vs +0x177), which is likely due to CachyOS's LTO/AutoFDO
compiler optimizations.
The warning appeared once in my initial test session:
Rate marked as a VHT rate but data is invalid: MCS: 0, NSS: 0
WARNING: net/mac80211/rx.c:5491 at ieee80211_rx_list+0x183/0x1020 [mac80211]
However, in subsequent module reload and reconnect cycles I was unable
to reproduce it. This is consistent with WARN_ONCE behavior -- it
likely fired on the first invalid nss=0 packet after the initial
driver load and has not triggered since. I cannot confirm it as a
reliable symptom.
---
Regarding patch stability: the results below are from testing your
original RFT patch [1], not any newer submission. I want to be
explicit to avoid confusion:
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20260311020816.7065-1-pkshih@realtek.com/
This is the exact diff I compiled and tested:
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
/* Copyright(c) 2018-2019 Realtek Corporation
*/
+#include <linux/dmi.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include "main.h"
@@ -1744,6 +1745,34 @@ const struct pci_error_handlers rtw_pci_err_handler = {
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtw_pci_err_handler);
+enum rtw88_quirk_dis_pci_caps {
+ QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_ASPM,
+};
+
+static int disable_pci_caps(const struct dmi_system_id *dmi)
+{
+ uintptr_t dis_caps = (uintptr_t)dmi->driver_data;
+
+ if (dis_caps & BIT(QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_ASPM))
+ rtw_pci_disable_aspm = true;
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static const struct dmi_system_id rtw88_pci_quirks[] = {
+ {
+ .callback = disable_pci_caps,
+ .ident = "HP Notebook - P3S95EA#ACB",
+ .matches = {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "HP"),
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "HP Notebook"),
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_SKU, "P3S95EA#ACB"),
+ },
+ .driver_data = (void *)BIT(QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_ASPM),
+ },
+ {}
+};
+
int rtw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
const struct pci_device_id *id)
{
@@ -1808,6 +1837,7 @@ int rtw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
bridge && bridge->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL)
rtwpci->rx_no_aspm = true;
+ dmi_check_system(rtw88_pci_quirks);
rtw_pci_phy_cfg(rtwdev);
ret = rtw_register_hw(rtwdev, hw);
Results with only this patch applied:
- The hard freeze lockup is gone.
- However, during idle the logs are flooded with:
rtw88_8821ce 0000:13:00.0: failed to send h2c command
rtw88_8821ce 0000:13:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
- To give a concrete sense of the volume: over an ~80-minute
observation window after a clean module reload, I recorded
11,757 "failed to send h2c command" events and 2 "firmware
failed to leave lps state" events -- approximately 110 errors
per minute during active periods.
- These errors cause Bluetooth audio stuttering and WiFi
throughput drops.
When I additionally set disable_lps_deep=Y alongside your ASPM patch,
all h2c errors vanish completely and Bluetooth/WiFi remain fully
stable. This confirms that disabling LPS Deep is necessary for
complete stability on this specific HP SKU.
I also noticed what appears to be a new patch in a separate mailing
list thread. I will test it shortly and report back with the results.
Best regards,
Oleksandr Havrylov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 21:48 [BUG] wifi: rtw88: Hard system freeze on RTL8821CE when power_save is enabled (LPS/ASPM conflict) LB F
2026-03-10 2:02 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-10 11:01 ` LB F
2026-03-10 15:12 ` LB F
2026-03-11 2:20 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-11 2:15 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-11 2:22 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-11 11:00 ` LB F
2026-03-11 15:22 ` LB F
2026-03-12 1:56 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-12 21:42 ` LB F
2026-03-13 0:03 ` LB F
2026-03-13 0:29 ` LB F
2026-03-14 10:52 ` LB F
2026-03-14 12:39 ` LB F
2026-03-15 0:24 ` LB F
2026-03-16 2:55 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-16 20:27 ` LB F [this message]
2026-03-17 1:28 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-18 0:00 ` LB F
2026-03-18 0:58 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-18 23:55 ` LB F
2026-03-19 0:22 ` LB F
2026-03-19 0:49 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-19 1:24 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-19 23:58 ` LB F
2026-03-20 0:41 ` LB F
2026-03-20 1:00 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-20 1:19 ` LB F
2026-03-20 2:02 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-21 12:07 ` LB F
2026-03-23 2:01 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-25 20:38 ` LB F
2026-03-26 23:52 ` LB F
2026-03-16 2:50 ` Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALdGYqSMUPnPfW-_q1RgYr0_SjoXUejAaJJr-o+jpwCk1S7ndQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=goainwo@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox