From: "Nicolas Escande" <nico.escande@gmail.com>
To: "Remi Pommarel" <repk@triplefau.lt>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>,
"Kalle Valo" <kvalo@kernel.org>,
"Jouni Malinen" <jouni@codeaurora.org>
Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: Fix possible stall on ath9k_txq_list_has_key()
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2023 12:14:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CT81H24H03PE.33SAJUIJQMY90@syracuse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230609093744.1985-1-repk@triplefau.lt>
On Fri Jun 9, 2023 at 11:37 AM CEST, Remi Pommarel wrote:
> On EDMA capable hardware, ath9k_txq_list_has_key() can enter infinite
> loop if it is called while all txq_fifos have packets that use different
> key that the one we are looking for. Fix it by exiting the loop if all
> txq_fifos have been checked already.
>
> Because this loop is called under spin_lock_bh() (see ath_txq_lock) it
> causes the following rcu stall:
>
> rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
> ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to read temperature -11
> rcu: 1-....: (5254 ticks this GP) idle=189/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=8442983/8442984 fqs=2579
> (t=5257 jiffies g=17983297 q=334)
> Task dump for CPU 1:
> task:hostapd state:R running task stack: 0 pid: 297 ppid: 289 flags:0x0000000a
> Call trace:
> dump_backtrace+0x0/0x170
> show_stack+0x1c/0x24
> sched_show_task+0x140/0x170
> dump_cpu_task+0x48/0x54
> rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0xf0/0x134
> rcu_sched_clock_irq+0x8d8/0x9fc
> update_process_times+0xa0/0xec
> tick_sched_timer+0x5c/0xd0
> __hrtimer_run_queues+0x154/0x320
> hrtimer_interrupt+0x120/0x2f0
> arch_timer_handler_virt+0x38/0x44
> handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x9c/0x1e0
> handle_domain_irq+0x64/0x90
> gic_handle_irq+0x78/0xb0
> call_on_irq_stack+0x28/0x38
> do_interrupt_handler+0x54/0x5c
> el1_interrupt+0x2c/0x4c
> el1h_64_irq_handler+0x14/0x1c
> el1h_64_irq+0x74/0x78
> ath9k_txq_has_key+0x1bc/0x250 [ath9k]
> ath9k_set_key+0x1cc/0x3dc [ath9k]
> drv_set_key+0x78/0x170
> ieee80211_key_replace+0x564/0x6cc
> ieee80211_key_link+0x174/0x220
> ieee80211_add_key+0x11c/0x300
> nl80211_new_key+0x12c/0x330
> genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xbc/0x11c
> genl_rcv_msg+0xd8/0x1c4
> netlink_rcv_skb+0x40/0x100
> genl_rcv+0x3c/0x50
> netlink_unicast+0x1ec/0x2c0
> netlink_sendmsg+0x198/0x3c0
> ____sys_sendmsg+0x210/0x250
> ___sys_sendmsg+0x78/0xc4
> __sys_sendmsg+0x4c/0x90
> __arm64_sys_sendmsg+0x28/0x30
> invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x60/0x100
> do_el0_svc+0x48/0xd0
> el0_svc+0x14/0x50
> el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa8/0xb0
> el0t_64_sync+0x158/0x15c
>
> This rcu stall is hard to reproduce as is, but changing ATH_TXFIFO_DEPTH
> from 8 to 2 makes it reasonably easy to reproduce.
>
> Fixes: ca2848022c12 ("ath9k: Postpone key cache entry deletion for TXQ frames reference it")
> Signed-off-by: Remi Pommarel <repk@triplefau.lt>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> index a4197c14f0a9..7f9f06ea8a05 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> @@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ static bool ath9k_txq_list_has_key(struct list_head *txq_list, u32 keyix)
> static bool ath9k_txq_has_key(struct ath_softc *sc, u32 keyix)
> {
> struct ath_hw *ah = sc->sc_ah;
> - int i;
> + int i, j;
> struct ath_txq *txq;
> bool key_in_use = false;
>
> @@ -868,8 +868,9 @@ static bool ath9k_txq_has_key(struct ath_softc *sc, u32 keyix)
> if (sc->sc_ah->caps.hw_caps & ATH9K_HW_CAP_EDMA) {
> int idx = txq->txq_tailidx;
>
> - while (!key_in_use &&
> - !list_empty(&txq->txq_fifo[idx])) {
> + for (j = 0; !key_in_use &&
> + !list_empty(&txq->txq_fifo[idx]) &&
> + j < ATH_TXFIFO_DEPTH; j++) {
> key_in_use = ath9k_txq_list_has_key(
> &txq->txq_fifo[idx], keyix);
> INCR(idx, ATH_TXFIFO_DEPTH);
Works with AR9392 (Qualcomm Atheros AR93xx Wireless Network Adapter (rev 01))
Tested-by: Nicolas Escande <nico.escande@gmail.com>
---
Nicolas E.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-09 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-09 9:37 [PATCH] ath9k: Fix possible stall on ath9k_txq_list_has_key() Remi Pommarel
2023-06-09 10:14 ` Nicolas Escande [this message]
2023-06-09 10:15 ` Kalle Valo
2023-06-09 12:42 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2023-06-13 9:09 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CT81H24H03PE.33SAJUIJQMY90@syracuse \
--to=nico.escande@gmail.com \
--cc=jouni@codeaurora.org \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=repk@triplefau.lt \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).