From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta0.migadu.com (out-178.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 302E8439909 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.178 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789108873; cv=none; b=V2xFD/m/XaN2f8hLxYE+L0XBjnogsWEoYLaIVe5duiV3+QNNv2sP3cjWSWkY9u58oJ1YB2OKbngqMu5I2/CM0w9w0rh0ZgSbPgFbAX7jskR2afYFsuvV5ro9GGz9JWbdaPWP1+oS1lC7CNIFO0H6TrDkwHr3uxfGk4r3seMZwB4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789108873; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ExOsGl2j4nMlAou7DL7hm0Ih5Hfn8Z4OdLD7D7iXx/g=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=HfAta9wujdW12oZmg1bzfEFHtaQBHgymxKVFwupiJpWImAG3awOsXqyCdzNrL9GYyQ3DhnhDxpO3AAAUfTkA2P+Ud0G5YuCcYJNY3ELsxkXK2I2kyqyEnZDV4zWjyEMiaWSND63dEAWHoyWiH7d3Z/MTMo/ojEVgkjGBtoowYN4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=hzhX8wi7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.178 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="hzhX8wi7" X-Envelope-To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=ExOsGl2j4nMlAou7DL7hm0Ih5Hfn8Z4OdLD7D7iXx/g=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1789108861; v=1; x=1789713661; b=hzhX8wi7czmdIH7/JaMa0S5TzkjJZY4gwY5uSktT5YYpndJu/sAex8VltPsbJJEScxnhfb1s YYWI4tYYhwgBYSpEHc5rlTR6bSXK1fp5U+Vsqd97r7vAgjogL1L132R6tcMlt5LJjPboyLhUqH3 oUCRrRFw84/0NRfPsU84sVwA= X-Envelope-To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id c00feb8a6972bf63; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:41:01 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: c00feb8a6972bf63 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 08:41:00 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Michael Straube" , "Peter Robinson" , "Bitterblue Smith" Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/7] wifi: rtw88: sdio: zero the padding added to a TX transfer From: "Luka Gejak" To: "Ping-Ke Shih" , "Luka Gejak" X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2 References: <20260909074556.55709-1-luka.gejak@linux.dev> <20260909074556.55709-5-luka.gejak@linux.dev> In-Reply-To: On Fri Sep 11, 2026 at 2:30 AM CEST, Ping-Ke Shih wrote: > Luka Gejak >>=20 >> One thing to decide, though. The commit message says the padding "costs >> nothing observable", which is too strong given the numbers in that same >> paragraph. Do you think it needs rewording? If so, would you be willing >> to amend it yourself when applying? That seems better than a resend of >> seven patches for one line. > > I can amend it myself as > > "... padding the transfer costs about 2% observable over transfer." > > Or you can help to reword the paragraph. I can copy & paste it. > > Ping-Ke Please amend it yourself, that is much better than a resend. Here is the change: =20 "padding the transfer costs nothing observable:" to "padding the transfer= =20 costs about 2% observable over transfer:" Leave the rest as is, after semicolons there are numbers to explain that 2%= . Best regards, Luka Gejak