From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0052AC4338F for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEAB1613D0 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:19:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232016AbhHWUUb (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:20:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54968 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231377AbhHWUUb (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:20:31 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B603C061575 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 13:19:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id s12so8438098ljg.0 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 13:19:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=0vaj0uznqYe2FBJmFOITTJ3IqWEuG169317oUglvcEY=; b=OtuDeDNUrV3Rzk/bqFdRCFW++lG/hxojlu0nhwhJ+N6MH8Klju7+XzQ4GPEvbEJj4s 7jPo+P/J8AfRNOswbzuSfWcDQQvLnWoomlHvoxKoOiSbO6EKb8LLGgQBU2rrlB8g96RT fhvZ7uBvosEEGqt5o0FGOMsBvQOjsXMOuifN/lXC/kcZPuNb1fYBIggHBfejJ5s7z0V9 811Dm6zLSqT06sb8jU9V6cNet5dOOHnmxTjyuW7Nm6s3YoRN5D9VhRpJfAoteBwZNUsH GTqk15EYOdCGz/vtnXMZnvP7M2dhWcwXSPio/StYPE2C9SkSib0ckhpH4NZ/XSmzhDS7 EUDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=0vaj0uznqYe2FBJmFOITTJ3IqWEuG169317oUglvcEY=; b=aJS9T2a+kS2W6FnhF56UGHn7vj0A+XdD8HwQNMnoDM3qyy1AVBluw44KGIP8qP84IX vQ9+qOvuxNuVuI1e/UG45C/fBapN4JlflI85Fz0R4rHLWkVX8zpdDxD8uORpO7fjZY3f aw39ejnU2QpAoD8Gri92dR8i10zbgxWD0C7fhe1OD46350xg5CU6bSwQFq7ZTP3PW7vr Pqk6F4SWG/KtmD4lAlpW5vsQOgciD7eEMEIxyzhzzy8k+BsF5PWeDrYyjmyzoszicRUS prWNQJikK96xMmB0rTVTrHJ+TAjCn+rpxu7vmQSrYlrANvzZC17qFfeGuSHrbcTI9f+Y 5Ibw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531liXnf5ox1sTwhInnPWnCqqGrhOh95Po7XfrVgfB1qE6JuHqZD UMLbSgNWUKnJ8223kXlShAc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwVfQcHNGRhsCMeMkAJgni0sp5/uJ0FX2VPazA3Al25tmUcQGNsQu0/6f7rxszKJFFH5QcSBA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b5d0:: with SMTP id g16mr29323870ljn.349.1629749985913; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 13:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([94.19.228.143]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j20sm1288275lji.41.2021.08.23.13.19.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 13:19:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:19:43 +0300 From: Andrey Skvortsov To: Brian Norris Cc: linux-wireless , ath10k , Wen Gong , Kalle Valo , Alvin =?utf-8?Q?=C5=A0ipraga?= , Julian Calaby , svp , felix+debian@gueux.org, Massimo Maggi Subject: Re: Revert: ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 21-08-23 10:23, Brian Norris wrote: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 9:49 AM Andrey Skvortsov > wrote: > > 4) As many users are affected by this problem and maintainers don't really > > want to revert the problematic patch, > > I'm not totally sure that's true. So far, it looks like an oversight. > > Over a year ago, Kalle said he "just need[ed] to check something > internally first": > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/87r1rsbdnx.fsf@codeaurora.org/ > > I don't see the result of that, except that this is marked Superseded: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200730124923.271429-1-alsi@bang-olufsen.dk/ > and this is marked Rejected: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200527165718.129307-1-briannorris@chromium.org/ > I'm not sure if the Rejected was before or after the last reply above... > > Maybe it needs an Nth person to submit a revert? Later (Dec 23, 2020) said "Actually I don't see how I could apply the revert due to the regulatory problems explained by Jouni". [1] I think this could be the date when your patch was marked as Rejected. 1. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2020-December/012370.html -- Best regards, Andrey Skvortsov