From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E01C432BE for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6EF60FDA for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243270AbhHZS1m (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 14:27:42 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48748 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235411AbhHZS1l (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 14:27:41 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FE3160FD7; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:26:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1630002414; bh=32hkB1Jyko2pe+hQm7VRhZiAhBPBd8eLpRR+hQOOdpc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hNoeq9Umus/dho31BYfRtfnkgcSTJIRGgQC7QtnjDs6dSzYni/zJv+vsROpb4v2yO DFkfikQZUsFsDGDr2whHBycPQt8pueGbZkHjgS6EYq98hPPWxO0RQxJD4ZGzUwnBv1 /2FrtOXIWJSDkoPZj2FEgfSbucMyyX4rBP3VS/jSbW1kDEDMsgfT2fOZKV7WkyF6YA NJlVZwombBJ+23tQxfYkQgKAf14Hg3ElYV7KMX0PSLGMAh5fbgHUzRoQKnYwP4cHTI wBu9UTLDmoQ74tf9yHf/BWwyfM4c1+QukqIjqiNLg8dst/vx64k/dAhKIYH3gVll7Y Aj3ev/A+jU6uQ== Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:26:53 -0500 From: Seth Forshee To: Victor Bayas Cc: wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update regulatory rules for Ecuador (EC) Message-ID: References: <20210825031409.10552-1-victorsbayas@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 11:22:49AM -0500, Victor Bayas wrote: > My apologies, I forgot to CC the mailing list in my previous reply. > > El jue, 26 de ago. de 2021 a la(s) 09:32, Seth Forshee > (sforshee@kernel.org) escribió: > > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:14:09PM -0500, Victor Bayas wrote: > > > Update the frequency ranges and power limits according to the current Ecuadorian norm [1], > > > corrected 5GHz maximum bandwidth since there are no legal restrictions in this subject. > > > > > > Note: 60GHz channels 1 to 3 are allowed without license for Point-to-Point links but > > > they aren't for Point-to-Multipoint links so they were omitted in this patch. > > > > > > [1] https://www.arcotel.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/NORMA-ESPECTRO-DE-USO-LIBRE-Y-ESPECTRO-PARA-USO-DETERMINADO-EN-BANDAS-LIBRES.pdf > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Victor Bayas > > > > Thanks for the patch! A few comments below. > > > > Thank you for your feedback. > > > > --- > > > db.txt | 12 +++++++----- > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt > > > index e7b11cf..4630854 100644 > > > --- a/db.txt > > > +++ b/db.txt > > > @@ -504,12 +504,14 @@ country DZ: DFS-JP > > > (5250.000 - 5330.000 @ 80.000), (23.00), DFS, AUTO-BW > > > (5490.000 - 5670.000 @ 160.000), (23.00), DFS > > > > > > +# Source: > > > +# https://www.arcotel.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/NORMA-ESPECTRO-DE-USO-LIBRE-Y-ESPECTRO-PARA-USO-DETERMINADO-EN-BANDAS-LIBRES.pdf > > > country EC: DFS-FCC > > > - (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20) > > > - (5170 - 5250 @ 20), (17) > > > - (5250 - 5330 @ 20), (24), DFS > > > - (5490 - 5730 @ 20), (24), DFS > > > - (5735 - 5835 @ 20), (30) > > > + (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (1000 mW) > > > + (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (50 mW), AUTO-BW > > > > It looks like 5150-5250 MHz also requires DFS. > > Yes, I tried contacting ARCOTEL without success to get a clarification > from them because other countries don't require DFS for 5150-5250 MHz. In the absence of any clarification we should stick with the rules as documented. The database can always be updated later if it turns out DFS is not a requirement. > > > > > > + (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (250 mW), AUTO-BW, DFS > > > + (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (250 mW), DFS > > > > 5250-5350 and 5470-5725 MHz require TPC. Since Linux does not support > > TPC the power limits need to be reduced by 3 dBm, which puts them at 125 > > mW. > > Thanks for the heads up, I forgot there was a TPC requirement. > > > > > I also don't see any DFS requirement for 5470-5725 MHz. > > Section 2.1.6 says that users of 5250 - 5350 MHz and 5470 - 5725 MHz > should apply the interference mitigation measures mitigation measures in > Recommendation ITU-R M.1652 to ensure compatible behavior with > radiodetermination systems. > > ITU-R M.1652 norm section 1.1 recommends the usage of DFS for > 5250 - 5350 MHz and 5470 - 5725 MHz, so I inferred the DFS > requirement for 5470 - 5725 MHz as well. > > https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/m/R-REC-M.1652-1-201105-I!!PDF-E.pdf Ah, yes, I missed that. Thanks, Seth