From: Dominique MARTINET <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"Amitkumar Karwar" <amitkarwar@gmail.com>,
"Jonas Dreßler" <verdre@v0yd.nl>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@gmail.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
Xinming Hu <huxinming820@gmail.com>,
Sharvari Harisangam <sharvari.harisangam@nxp.com>,
Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: mwifiex cmd timeout on one pci variant
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 14:36:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YThLznrMQ4EYUDEl@atmark-techno.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YTg/f5mHQ6jjHDt6@atmark-techno.com>
(+cc Jonas Dreßler, sorry for two mails in a row for others)
Dominique MARTINET wrote on Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 01:43:43PM +0900:
> I've got a board with an i.MX8MP chip, and three different marvell W8997
> M.2 modules
(I just noticed Jonas' patches "mwifiex: Work around firmware bugs on
88W8897 chip" on linux-wireless, but it doesn't seem to change anything
for me, so my problem isn't related to pci post or interrupt wake
apparently. Was worth a try...)
I'm surprised though he says the latest firmware is 15.68.19.p21, but I
can't find it anywhere -- linux-firmware only has up to 16.68.1.p179 and
I got 16.68.10.p16 from NXP dependencies, and now I'm searching a bit
harder i also found 16.92.10.p124 !? (note 16.92 instead of 16.68, also
NXP) but I have no idea where to find anything 'official' from marvell
as git.marvell.com/mwifiex-firmware.git disappeared.
Where could I find this version you speak of?
Thanks,
> -- one from laird which works fine, and two from azurewave
> which are labeled exactly the same AW-CM276MA 2276MA PCIE-UART except
> one works and not the other.
> The inscription on the chip itself are slightly different, one saying
> it's a W8997-M1216 from marvell (works) and the other having AW-CM276NF
> azurewave mark. The electronics around are also different.
>
> I could say it's just a bad chip, but I've actually got two of each
> (samples) which act the same... And I've tried it in another device
> where it works with the same kernel/firmware, so there must be something
> wrong on the board as well as the wifi card works elsewhere.
>
>
> Anyway, if someone knows how to get around to debugging this, I'd
> appreciate a pointer! I can't see anything wrong with the tools I have
> here.
> If nothing else, I can't read /sys/class/devcoredump/devcd*/data that I
> saw Amitkumar Karwar request somewhere else, so just deciphering this
> would be great help.
>
>
> dmesg looks like this on failure:
> [ 108.513028] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: mwifiex_cmd_timeout_func: Timeout cmd id = 0x10, act = 0x1
> [ 108.522388] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: num_data_h2c_failure = 0
> [ 108.528310] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: num_cmd_h2c_failure = 0
> [ 108.534143] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: is_cmd_timedout = 1
> [ 108.539631] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: num_tx_timeout = 0
> [ 108.545029] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: last_cmd_index = 0
> [ 108.550431] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: last_cmd_id: 10 00 28 00 16 00 cd 00 1e 00
> [ 108.557913] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: last_cmd_act: 01 00 13 00 01 00 01 00 00 00
> [ 108.565484] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: last_cmd_resp_index = 4
> [ 108.571318] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: last_cmd_resp_id: df 80 28 80 16 80 cd 80 1e 80
> [ 108.579237] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: last_event_index = 2
> [ 108.584810] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: last_event: 00 00 0b 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00
> [ 108.592206] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: data_sent=0 cmd_sent=1
> [ 108.597954] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: ps_mode=1 ps_state=0
> [ 108.604085] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: ===mwifiex driverinfo dump start===
> [ 108.613552] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: info: MWIFIEX VERSION: mwifiex 1.0 (16.68.1.p179)
> [ 108.621748] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: PCIE register dump start
> [ 108.627676] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: pcie scratch register:
> [ 108.633441] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: reg:0xcf0, value=0xfedcba00
> reg:0xcf8, value=0x8260049
> reg:0xcfc, value=0x1282820
>
> [ 108.648584] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: PCIE register dump end
> [ 108.654411] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: ===mwifiex driverinfo dump end===
> [ 108.661119] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: == mwifiex firmware dump start ==
> [ 110.560689] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: cmd_wait_q terminated: -110
> [ 148.127107] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: == mwifiex firmware dump end ==
> [ 148.134552] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: == mwifiex dump information to /sys/class/devcoredump start
> [ 148.143669] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: == mwifiex dump information to /sys/class/devcoredump end
> [ 148.152485] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: PREP_CMD: FW is in bad state
> [ 148.158915] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: info: shutdown mwifiex...
> [ 148.165829] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: PREP_CMD: card is removed
> [ 148.443761] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: info: dnld wifi firmware from 169340 bytes
> [ 149.511193] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: info: FW download over, size 632240 bytes
> [ 150.163677] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: WLAN FW is active
> [ 150.231583] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: info: MWIFIEX VERSION: mwifiex 1.0 (16.68.1.p179)
> [ 150.239814] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: driver_version = mwifiex 1.0 (16.68.1.p179)
>
> I tried with two different firmwares, full dmesg and data.txt are here:
> hang on `ip link set mlan0 up`:
> https://codewreck.org/tmp/16.68.1.p179-data.txt
> https://codewreck.org/tmp/16.68.1.p179-dmesg
>
> hang on `iw mlan0 scan` after successful link up:
> https://codewreck.org/tmp/16.68.1.p179-2-data.txt
> https://codewreck.org/tmp/16.68.1.p179-2-dmesg
>
> other firmware (dmesg truncated to just timeout message):
> https://codewreck.org/tmp/16.68.10.p16-data.txt
> https://codewreck.org/tmp/16.68.10.p16-dmesg
>
>
>
> Extra info:
> - it doesn't always fail at the same place, so this looks like a
> tolerance problem? e.g. sometimes transmission works and sometimes
> a message is garbled?
>
> - on the working azurewave module I can keep the card maxed at ~300mbps
> in or ~100mbps out without problem for a while with iperf so signals
> can't be that bad...? Or that could just be wishful thinking!
--
Dominique Martinet
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-08 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-08 4:43 mwifiex cmd timeout on one pci variant Dominique MARTINET
2021-09-08 5:36 ` Dominique MARTINET [this message]
2021-09-08 5:45 ` [EXT] " Sharvari Harisangam
2021-09-08 5:56 ` Dominique MARTINET
2021-09-14 10:11 ` Jonas Dreßler
2021-09-15 1:43 ` Dominique MARTINET
2021-09-15 10:06 ` Jonas Dreßler
2021-09-08 16:56 ` Brian Norris
2021-09-08 23:48 ` Dominique MARTINET
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YThLznrMQ4EYUDEl@atmark-techno.com \
--to=dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com \
--cc=amitkarwar@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ganapathi017@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=huxinming820@gmail.com \
--cc=kitakar@gmail.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sharvari.harisangam@nxp.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=verdre@v0yd.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox