From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Miaoqing Pan <quic_miaoqing@quicinc.com>
Cc: quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com, ath11k@lists.infradead.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
johan+linaro@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 ath-next 2/2] wifi: ath11k: fix HTC rx insufficient length
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 11:09:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z866cCj8SWyZjCoP@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250310010217.3845141-3-quic_miaoqing@quicinc.com>
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 09:02:17AM +0800, Miaoqing Pan wrote:
> A relatively unusual race condition occurs between host software
> and hardware, where the host sees the updated destination ring head
> pointer before the hardware updates the corresponding descriptor.
> When this situation occurs, the length of the descriptor returns 0.
I still think this description is too vague and it doesn't explain how
this race is even possible. It sounds like there's a bug somewhere in
the driver or firmware, but if this really is an indication the hardware
is broken as your reply here seems to suggest:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/bc187777-588c-4fa0-ba8c-847e91c78d43@quicinc.com/
then that too should be highlighted in the commit message (e.g. by
describing this as "working around broken hardware").
> The current error handling method is to increment descriptor tail
> pointer by 1, but 'sw_index' is not updated, causing descriptor and
> skb to not correspond one-to-one, resulting in the following error:
>
> ath11k_pci 0006:01:00.0: HTC Rx: insufficient length, got 1488, expected 1492
> ath11k_pci 0006:01:00.0: HTC Rx: insufficient length, got 1460, expected 1484
>
> To address this problem, temporarily skip processing the current
> descriptor and handle it again next time. However, to prevent this
> descriptor from continuously returning 0, use skb cb to set a flag.
> If the length returns 0 again, this descriptor will be discarded.
The ath12k ring-buffer handling looks very similar. Do you need a
corresponding workaround in ath12k_ce_completed_recv_next()? Or are you
sure that this (hardware) bug only affects ath11k devices?
> *nbytes = ath11k_hal_ce_dst_status_get_length(desc);
> - if (*nbytes == 0) {
> - ret = -EIO;
> - goto err;
> + if (unlikely(*nbytes == 0)) {
> + struct ath11k_skb_rxcb *rxcb =
> + ATH11K_SKB_RXCB(pipe->dest_ring->skb[sw_index]);
> +
> + /* A relatively unusual race condition occurs between host
> + * software and hardware, where the host sees the updated
> + * destination ring head pointer before the hardware updates
> + * the corresponding descriptor.
> + *
> + * Temporarily skip processing the current descriptor and handle
> + * it again next time. However, to prevent this descriptor from
> + * continuously returning 0, set 'is_desc_len0' flag. If the
> + * length returns 0 again, this descriptor will be discarded.
> + */
> + if (!rxcb->is_desc_len0) {
> + rxcb->is_desc_len0 = true;
> + ret = -EIO;
> + goto err;
> + }
> }
I'm still waiting for feedback from one user that can reproduce the
ring-buffer corruption very easily, but another user mentioned seeing
multiple zero-length descriptor warnings over the weekend when running
with this patch:
ath11k_pci 0006:01:00.0: rxed invalid length (nbytes 0, max 2048)
Are there ever any valid reasons for seeing a zero-length descriptor
(i.e. unrelated to the race at hand)? IIUC the warning would only be
printed when processing such descriptors a second time (i.e. when
is_desc_len0 is set).
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-10 1:02 [PATCH v2 ath-next 0/2] wifi: ath11k: fix HTC rx insufficient length Miaoqing Pan
2025-03-10 1:02 ` [PATCH v2 ath-next 1/2] wifi: ath11k: add function to get next srng desc Miaoqing Pan
2025-03-10 1:02 ` [PATCH v2 ath-next 2/2] wifi: ath11k: fix HTC rx insufficient length Miaoqing Pan
2025-03-10 10:09 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2025-03-11 8:29 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-03-11 15:20 ` Jeff Johnson
2025-03-12 1:11 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-03-12 16:43 ` Johan Hovold
2025-03-13 1:41 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-03-13 15:57 ` Johan Hovold
2025-03-14 0:46 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-03-13 13:31 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-03-13 16:14 ` Johan Hovold
2025-03-14 1:01 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-03-14 8:06 ` Johan Hovold
2025-03-14 8:19 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-03-17 5:52 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-03-17 13:04 ` Johan Hovold
2025-03-18 7:53 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-03-18 17:42 ` Johan Hovold
2025-03-19 6:47 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-03-21 9:35 ` Johan Hovold
2025-03-25 1:04 ` Miaoqing Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z866cCj8SWyZjCoP@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_miaoqing@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox