From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912EBEB64DA for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 17:14:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231616AbjGTROi (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2023 13:14:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53246 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231576AbjGTROf (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2023 13:14:35 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com (mail-pf1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 315111739 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:14:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-66869feb7d1so676140b3a.3 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:14:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1689873273; x=1690478073; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dlpcsYGlL/x0GLBNI9qt63nhzbsb90iaISSHZS7FpDM=; b=CjKnS3oHJIwg837yod+g3i9B5tVNjG93bWuJj6DAAbr6Gkeo8VYCDDgsH/DoOVaTuK tZ1eGblyS4kLLJkRavqj6EjlTMx2W8KcFrnxYvn8PVBVX6JyibFa82clyqkLqUh3BK3M qmXCCH9vLAObiep2RBKOUI3KeqvE5clK5i0s0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689873273; x=1690478073; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=dlpcsYGlL/x0GLBNI9qt63nhzbsb90iaISSHZS7FpDM=; b=QzqIhfWuxjwjOHU0oBFY20pzKq2BPcqj69BgLdc7HybaOdkotDtvPf93i7DNIYHGvR pYDMTgtfWOGalUzkqDIEGZ10InkCBaDjDzY4aRpeV0m0RnjdlJdZ3BIyF9u1wDFLEdFL Eki4Hq0GvnyqLXEfocYs3gq5PWxvPiwupomwgNUwMBR7cHJK7s9r/VGT1EMqTlVXtJdJ YdNmjzIYbsocGIzYox+NRu84QJiScxIwqaKqoVjzSd/7I6Bu+WT7OxZwNtVzOhTmT4eT CL1lEvNtwe5W32APj9oTPho9c1pKAEBQgQt6t0EEmqEYUz07M81wWocrg5+A6TyDneZB /rqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLaEb2So6EMCfqazS9f0YQHB+iZD/PcG+oGtRRd24HX0Tiknytvu Yiudokrjyul8Nbcfe8UVjUSUsA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlGqbJIS+cAL7U5Puzwioyfho0TNrFgA7mqXlDduG1s5LonZa4aGKv/+YUILXGom+bAlXbNOqQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:88d6:0:b0:682:5a68:5645 with SMTP id k22-20020aa788d6000000b006825a685645mr2796007pff.11.1689873273533; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:9d:2:cf2f:1797:934f:52a2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e26-20020aa7825a000000b00678159eacecsm1430800pfn.121.2023.07.20.10.14.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:14:31 -0700 From: Brian Norris To: Kalle Valo Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Pink Perfect , amitkarwar@gmail.com, ganapathi017@gmail.com, sharvari.harisangam@nxp.com, huxinming820@gmail.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] wifi: mwifiex: Fix OOB and integer underflow when rx packets Message-ID: References: <20230713023731.2518507-1-pinkperfect2021@gmail.com> <20230713105644.49444826@kernel.org> <87sf9j3wd1.fsf@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sf9j3wd1.fsf@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 09:55:38AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > We have four maintainers for mwifiex and total silence: > > MARVELL MWIFIEX WIRELESS DRIVER > M: Amitkumar Karwar > M: Ganapathi Bhat > M: Sharvari Harisangam > M: Xinming Hu > L: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org > S: Maintained > F: drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/ > > I'm very close of marking this driver as orphan unless anyone steps up. > This is not how to maintain a driver. I'd be fully on board with removing these maintainers, as I don't recall hearing from any of them in years. (In fact, some of these addresses don't have a single mail logged on lore.kernel.org/all/...) I just didn't want to be the one to say it. On the other hand, I regularly look at pretty much anything for mwifiex, as long as the submitter is in relatively good faith. So I wouldn't mind being a Reviewer (or Maintainer? what's the difference, when Kalle does the committing anyway?). And that might qualify as "Odd Fixes", as I don't plan on doing much more than keeping the lights on. I'll submit the MAINTAINERS patch if you'd like. Brian