From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz (jabberwock.ucw.cz [46.255.230.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF18D76EEA; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.255.230.98 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710232987; cv=none; b=WXgoUcZxL9hdP6LV5tBUyQAxutE/fD+peYQgREQMw8PSAUZeQTIeAiCEWEAzIFKYjqHKmKJCwJE3KB7vzulGoGRLIbfdxgEyp+Nn5YkxfxHvI6V7Zf3zEardNsl14HZkSzlTitYTiwFzcAVXsCMs/zanXK2Na0uohzJ9KIxhKv4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710232987; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8PTC3st//TZQtxJV2dNX9uPD5gJj55Zs3j0hF1eyaUs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=p7hvP3s95CPX+zUiZtLkL2FeIJheLC+UVE/NbykN3N+a3WuFePjfK+w3hrinx9q6VGrPnfJvHU8XamsBk2e5Tlihhx5+TZZhTZW7C/ThmrcMqP4LlinLtOdmj1lfWT3M4C/j6l/2jSyAZ39MaWTotEskrLh4Oxq1Ab9947uByL8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ucw.cz; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ucw.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ucw.cz header.i=@ucw.cz header.b=loRvjQAW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.255.230.98 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ucw.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ucw.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ucw.cz header.i=@ucw.cz header.b="loRvjQAW" Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 890651C007F; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:43:01 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ucw.cz; s=gen1; t=1710232981; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=v91wZVSG1tHVmRuWN1qiVImveP0XzlTDO1nWD46gUJo=; b=loRvjQAWm3P3Jo8q7qb64psvBgHTz2l4iOi+wkuoMPvD5KHCVIvAYLTytKtc93Oflj04B6 6GlIJztqjIjMFEQdY7u0TolPubSTIgPtYDWCgNgkuTowvNjqRLsxyYgAOiHBoUHG6/3aGJ JiJcjbHg2kqDYPQD4oPrVSR54LWq20o= Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:43:00 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Ping-Ke Shih Cc: Fiona Klute , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Kalle Valo , Ulf Hansson , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , =?utf-8?Q?Ond=C5=99ej?= Jirman Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] rtw88: Add support for RTL8723CS/RTL8703B Message-ID: References: <20240311103735.615541-1-fiona.klute@gmx.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oJG9/PmtjpM3J0ZL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --oJG9/PmtjpM3J0ZL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > > v4: > > * Move definition of GET_RX_DESC_BW from rtw8703b.c to rx.h (now in > > patch 3/9 "wifi: rtw88: Add definitions for 8703b chip") >=20 > v4 looks good to me. Thanks for the great work!=20 >=20 > I also have run sparse/smatch with v4, no warning/error. Does it mean you queued the patch, or is someone else expected to do that? Best regards, Pavel --=20 People of Russia, stop Putin before his war on Ukraine escalates. --oJG9/PmtjpM3J0ZL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCZfAVlAAKCRAw5/Bqldv6 8spzAJwIiOlVNcksyRfJ9gr5uv+xyAzkZgCgj7iw0ScQtCNbuHqRwDrnwDyzo5E= =Lmem -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oJG9/PmtjpM3J0ZL--