From: Jonas Hort <jonas.hort@posteo.de>
To: Devin Wittmayer <lucid_duck@justthetip.ca>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
regressions@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] mt7925: MLO connectivity silently stalls with 6GHz link active
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:34:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3d6db95-7db8-4fa4-808f-46ed43d183ff@posteo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b83a5708-b5f4-48e9-85a5-37b3ab34af46@posteo.de>
Quick follow-up: managed to confirm 6.18 as a clean baseline on my
own hardware now (not just secondhand from others in the forum
thread) - running Linux 6.18.42-1-cachyos-lts with MLO active
(5GHz+6GHz, same FritzBox 5690 Pro) for 3 hours straight, no freeze
at all.
$ uname -r
6.18.42-1-cachyos-lts
$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 6.18.42-1-cachyos-lts (linux-cachyos-lts@cachyos) (gcc
(GCC) 16.1.1 20260728, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.47) #1 SMP
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon, 03 Aug 2026 17:38:28 +0000
$ uptime -p
up 3 hours, 2 minutes
$ iw dev wlan0 link
Connected to 96:fc:7d:1a:7f:f0 (on wlan0)
SSID: BKA Diensttelefon #52
Link 1 BSSID b6:fc:7d:1a:7f:f0
freq: 5200.0
Link 2 BSSID c6:fc:7d:1a:7f:f0
freq: 5975.0
MLD 96:fc:7d:1a:7f:f0 stats:
RX: 448724534 bytes (2158217 packets)
TX: 257975286 bytes (1259211 packets)
signal: -64 dBm
tx bitrate: 1921.5 MBit/s 160MHz EHT-MCS 9 EHT-NSS 2 EHT-GI 0
Regards,
Jonas
Am 17.08.26 um 16:25 schrieb Jonas Hort:
> First, thanks to everyone helping out with this - really appreciate
> the time you're all putting in.
>
> One correction to how I described this earlier: the connection does
> NOT reliably self-heal on its own. I have manually intervened every
> single time to restore connectivity - either by disconnecting and
> reconnecting the WiFi connection, or by switching to my band-lock
> workaround (forcing 5GHz-only, which disables MLO). What I can say
> for certain: the system itself has never needed a reboot - it stays
> fully responsive throughout, only the WiFi link itself needs manual
> action to recover. Wanted to correct that record before it causes
> confusion.
>
> Update on the ROC tracing: three real freezes captured now with the
> kprobes active (all confirmed via the WFDMA0 tail-frozen signature).
>
> - Freeze #1 (15:37): no ROC activity in the trace. Fixed by
> disconnecting/reconnecting the WiFi connection fairly quickly.
> - Freeze #2 (15:43): this time I deliberately waited longer before
> intervening. The trace shows several ROC events (rocabort, mloroc,
> rocwork) clustered together. Fixed by switching to the band-lock
> workaround (5GHz-only).
> - Freeze #3 (16:15): no ROC activity again. Fixed by
> disconnecting/reconnecting the WiFi connection.
>
> Uploaded all three logs to the bugzilla ticket if useful:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221884
>
> Still haven't gotten to confirming 6.18 as a clean baseline on my own
> hardware - that's next on my list.
>
> Am 16.08.26 um 22:48 schrieb Devin Wittmayer:
>> On 15/08/2026 07:51, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> CCing Devin, who wrote two of the following messages
>> Those are the mt7921 regd deadlock. mt7925 does not have it, there is no
>> equivalent of the mt7921_mac_sta_add() call site that creates it.
>>
>> Worth ruling in or out before you bisect. mt7925 sets
>> IEEE80211_MLD_CAP_OP_MAX_SIMUL_LINKS to 0 in mt7925/main.c. It is an N-1
>> field, mt7996 sets MT7996_MAX_RADIOS - 1, so 0 means one simultaneous
>> link,
>> and mt7925/mcu.c then requests MT7925_ROC_REQ_MLSR_AG or _AA. MLSR is
>> multi-link single radio: your two links share one radio, and ROC is what
>> moves it between them.
>>
>> If 5 GHz is your deflink, your pair is named on that path in
>> mt7925_mac_set_links():
>>
>> if (band == NL80211_BAND_2GHZ ||
>> (band == NL80211_BAND_5GHZ && secondary_band ==
>> NL80211_BAND_6GHZ)) {
>> mt7925_abort_roc(...);
>> mt7925_set_mlo_roc(...);
>> }
>>
>> That one only runs at association. The path that can run mid-session is
>> mt7925_change_vif_links(), which calls mt7925_set_mlo_roc() for each
>> added
>> link. Both reach mt7925_mcu_set_mlo_roc(), and all of this is the
>> same in
>> 7.1 and 7.2-rc7.
>>
>> Under your existing watchdog:
>>
>> cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
>> echo 'r:mloroc mt7925_mcu_set_mlo_roc ret=$retval:s32' >
>> kprobe_events
>> echo 'r:rocabort mt7925_mcu_abort_roc ret=$retval:s32' >>
>> kprobe_events
>> echo 'p:rocwork mt7925_roc_work' >> kprobe_events
>> echo 1 > events/kprobes/enable
>>
>> Association will fire mloroc once, so anything later is a mid-session
>> switch. If the WFDMA0 tail freezes while one of those is in flight,
>> it is a
>> link switch that did not finish. If they are silent across a stall, the
>> whole path is ruled out and that is worth as much.
>>
>> On the bisect itself: your 6.18 good point is second-hand, from
>> different
>> hardware and a different AP. Worth confirming on your own box before
>> spending steps against it.
>>
>> Devin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 14:04 [REGRESSION] mt7925: MLO connectivity silently stalls with 6GHz link active Jonas Hort
2026-08-15 5:51 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-08-16 20:48 ` Devin Wittmayer
2026-08-17 14:25 ` Jonas Hort
2026-08-17 21:34 ` Jonas Hort [this message]
2026-08-19 1:18 ` Devin Wittmayer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-19 9:03 Jonas Hort
2026-08-19 9:03 Jonas Hort
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a3d6db95-7db8-4fa4-808f-46ed43d183ff@posteo.de \
--to=jonas.hort@posteo.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com \
--cc=lucid_duck@justthetip.ca \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox