Re: [RFC] qtn: add FullMAC firmware for Quantenna QSR10G wifi device

[IgorMitsyanko <igor.mitsyanko.os@quantenna.com>]

On 11/23/2016 06:25 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> IgorMitsyanko <igor.mitsyanko.os@quantenna.com> writes:
>
>> To clarify with you and Kalle, as persons involved with
>> linux-wireless: is my understanding correct that submitting firmware
>> into linux-fimware repository is a prerequisite to accepting new
>> driver into linux-wireless?
> In my opinion the most important is that the device is usable with an
> upstream driver so that anyone can start using the driver (if they have
> the hardware).
>
>> There is an option to start Quantenna device from internal flash
>> memory, no external binary files involved. If we will introduce this
>> functionality and remove code handling external firmware for now
>> (until firmware problem resolved), would that allow driver to be
>> reviewed/accepted?
> Do all the publically available hardware contain the firmware in
> internal flash (flashed in the factory)? Or is this something which must
> be installed separately for each board's internal flash by the user?

Each board must have flash installed on it, preflashed in the factory 
with uboot and firmware binary, otherwise board won't boot (won't boot 
without uboot, firmware itself is not mandatory).
Booting from flash is default behavior on boards that are currently on 
the market, but for developemnt purpuses it's not very convenient and 
harder to upgrade.

>
> BTW, the original mail with the firmware image didn't make it to the
> list, I guess it was too big? It would be good if you could post the
> license separately so that people can see it.
>

I resent the email without binary patch to linux-wireless. Yes, it was 
big, I guess next time we better use pull requests on github.