From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8665533D50B for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 09:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768900173; cv=none; b=kv0T8FuS/++2UvPf06H+FWPjKyEbKSQwVQfZPafS4mr1TyBTyvA8SZWmxNJeJzhwtERrWbojuV+14KKXUx6E02NDU5NlLRKnQoDkH8BXPE3Xicis7HfomPYcQmyVRPPRTjYaArRhOzu5W/TL40MaZKNqDh8jtw2hutRfbDvF4Tg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768900173; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JV+6rrKQ9IQXrxzGdWI2nV4l8On0RbEumkFXoZ3I7PE=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=F783Mu4EtgO77KRVHHy6fFRp4AyE6JSr3J7Xh7mL1YlLH6uvFxLjCpM40Tc+e8s5v/hMUc7Fz0ud3t95zTuY4I8ixs4kaDtbJlEvOYRufBibjMGXGlNkexshN0a2kl52ZOCnogfVuoYP96UHI6FhBataNAyholRwR9msCfAPdyQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=IVmIsjRT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="IVmIsjRT" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=LKlmelLVvxQ0Ahczs5JZXsGUjMDn/JYcj1uTWGW7Vkg=; t=1768900171; x=1770109771; b=IVmIsjRTgJo0e1SL6w2dVUa0GJH1nrY+RF1Ywj9B+YDI51t V6NpP1rF1JG5JqerKYASRyoeajRtXkE33wI54oUWUPjTolKApfr3iKsIBkOTvj14wp0xs4+hvhBmr gmndyDF7NtSFuj+yXlsG6mWE51dC9r/KekCsd5280ZqYmDEBzOcDzhdcVpsSlmZqAh3NIWVYc9D/H dFVHf/tqH610oRdsSMmWse/Ay/6+GInvhNeUmppR3Y3S6yilsZy3qV1Lve40cn9wsLaP/qca5dAhf Gn/gbH8hD4jA89qTjju3eOq9g10ZWpPYI0sr8uz92A5rv2r01ovLETVHMf2H/QZg==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vi7jm-0000000GiwU-3EbB; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:09:22 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH iwlwifi] wifi: mac80211: ignore reserved bits in reconfiguration status From: Johannes Berg To: Miri Korenblit , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: Benjamin Berg , Ilan Peer Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:09:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20260118095410.e54a0830f697.I9aef8f4fb6f1b06671bb6cf0e2bd4ec6e4c8bda4@changeid> (sfid-20260118_085436_785820_710033D5) References: <20260118095410.e54a0830f697.I9aef8f4fb6f1b06671bb6cf0e2bd4ec6e4c8bda4@changeid> (sfid-20260118_085436_785820_710033D5) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.56.2 (3.56.2-2.fc42) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Sun, 2026-01-18 at 09:54 +0200, Miri Korenblit wrote: >=20 > +++ b/net/mac80211/mlme.c > @@ -10243,7 +10243,7 @@ void ieee80211_process_ml_reconf_resp(struct ieee= 80211_sub_if_data *sdata, > for (i =3D 0; i < mgmt->u.action.u.ml_reconf_resp.count; i++) { > u16 status =3D get_unaligned_le16(pos + 1); > =20 > - link_id =3D *pos; > + link_id =3D u8_get_bits(*pos, 0xf); Seems like there should be a constant for that? Or maybe even some kind of struct for the "Reconfiguration Status Duple subfield", rather than parsing the things separately? johannes