From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-b8-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b8-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46EFF2A1AA for ; Tue, 13 May 2025 14:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.151 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747145951; cv=none; b=eWb2IBjSetO7zzB6fvaWSVNxmkhskSkIP2IvSH1pDr9ze7APbPaxL6EHdWv+/Kye/bo/AfFxkbEnKmjAD0cH9B0d7h6nH5n8FkOKMh+3mU5oekPs86zdi8vBK9A1k6ry/KbZ/kEFOLavrK82Tm6Sesl61j9nNK7GYYRoskV/FZc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747145951; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qI0l1jPkGmUc4iDvptp/RpoVvbNoY/49q4uJZxv6V7k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QhrwggufTop7NIxL3L8Y4kIrtDRRbjVFr4FkQUbdyEFVsgJx21M3ci3VOsQy9uwyT6KWdKJlcMuhZnJjdiDuTS0JEhaIVS2OkeVlKbvcVw2S6JKQ7qnhRrAIp4m4xY59SmArsZBdxCWdc/6kA6Hdoi3syGjB/0YzpB2VlqZ1Twc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=jfarr.cc; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jfarr.cc; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jfarr.cc header.i=@jfarr.cc header.b=jV4Q/3Bp; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=GhiLDiZn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.151 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=jfarr.cc Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jfarr.cc Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jfarr.cc header.i=@jfarr.cc header.b="jV4Q/3Bp"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="GhiLDiZn" Received: from phl-compute-01.internal (phl-compute-01.phl.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEFC11400FA; Tue, 13 May 2025 10:19:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-01.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 13 May 2025 10:19:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jfarr.cc; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1747145948; x=1747232348; bh=geTc495hh2 iyG6Y4r+X7LKSaUQIljkLtMJPSCSM09a0=; b=jV4Q/3Bp36bJ1TV2Eh6vX+3bp9 aJltQJv9N8zFYkgHXDT+DrLx+fey292tjkWfn9E2oCGF/W4jpZyjzrb1a+BkfuR/ C5Ty7y0zIOcj6fBcf4VmIWfz6QunuXbmztoqAbAm9VLzRfX8p8JAnhxcQeTu2uyQ WGrzMUnJo4zfWVKm80Xc/qdch/BP5rltfJN3ohBhnOxzFT/0XrXJCvnLK+3HpBI8 MD5gieJ8Ccol4P9ALDYMKCBrDWXYNPCb00Fvs2FXe6LTsyOVqqcJKBngY2PCzoft miDtIWUnDdmuGuVWrigtkAiA034GNCp8rJWnpQE7huNNdOlw6UAEW627q/7g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1747145948; x=1747232348; bh=geTc495hh2iyG6Y4r+X7LKSaUQIljkLtMJP SCSM09a0=; b=GhiLDiZnG4hI7WosdzWng+WFUhYHbkjYBRfbqOlcRJ6zaYCO8BY IzRB3utWkpQ5D+fEhLGuK3gDyZDL7gxvWuQiBvaLRAkG/ox5m+5f26qGQgtMFkfY 7UEKR1Os1f3F2j6TGxGODfCoyK5bFc8lKGBlHypF+U20mSC3eNhDcjK/0trHZ/LW rZmkg22oQJ8PLBd+nTOVppCJP7g9S24myKdWlqtS0kbDtVpIdkh2Su5sP/cjtePm JSKlb002jBqjLNOEtQ1fnnaqqZwf0ZAWh+cbUVN4QwcBf1eFHo+abDm1R5k9Mezc ioeUlD1QtgoT7ho084MbbjTRltWqaju2caw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdeftdegfeefucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpih gvnhhtshculddquddttddmnegfrhhlucfvnfffucdlfedtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefu kfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpeflrghnucfjvghnughrihhkucfhrg hrrhcuoehkvghrnhgvlhesjhhfrghrrhdrtggtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefteel ieeffffhveeiieejgeegledtueejheetgeefkeeiudffffejhffgieetjeenucffohhmrg hinhepphgtrghpnhhgrdhithdpphgtrghpnhhgrdhsohenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehkvghrnhgvlhesjhhfrghrrhdrtggtpd hnsggprhgtphhtthhopeeipdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopeguvghn khgvnhiisehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhohhgrnhhnvghssehsihhpsh holhhuthhiohhnshdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehprhgvshhtfihojhesghhmrghilhdr tghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehlihhnuhigqdifihhrvghlvghsshesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnh gvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehmihhrihgrmhdrrhgrtghhvghlrdhkohhrvghnsghl ihhtsehinhhtvghlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepihifugeslhhishhtshdrlhhinhhugi druggvvh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i01d149f8:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 13 May 2025 10:19:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 16:19:05 +0200 From: Jan Hendrik Farr To: Denis Kenzior Cc: Johannes Berg , James Prestwood , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Miri Korenblit , iwd@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: wifi: iwlwifi: SAE fails when AP sends confirm before STA Message-ID: References: <4ffbeb94-ac19-4437-9d98-24981fe6c240@gmail.com> <15943a1f-0e5d-4705-b8ef-3f22fa3fe672@gmail.com> <902daf8802c723d72fff0155cd0638848ce1bc7f.camel@sipsolutions.net> <8a1c5172bc0fd9d2a33522294d1a2a4c4ceb313a.camel@sipsolutions.net> <562c4ac5-088d-4bab-9883-1d4f8eca2b2a@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <562c4ac5-088d-4bab-9883-1d4f8eca2b2a@gmail.com> On 13 09:03:54, Denis Kenzior wrote: > Hi Jan, > > > > > There is a an SAE confirm sent by the AP. It's frame 170 in > > capture2.pcapng. It's also retried a number of times after that. > > > > What I also find interesting is that the kernel on the client side reports > sending the Authenticate-Confirm 3 times (according to dmesg and > trace2.dat), but only a single Confirm from the client is seen in the air > trace. I'm guessing the retransmissions (attempt 2 & 3) are lost somehow?. Yes this is weird. On my first capture I did see those additional confirm frames from the client (frame 4007 and 4052 in capture.pcapng). So maybe the capture device missed them in the second capture? Although the RSSIs look good in the 2nd capture. > > [64414.164169] wlan0: send auth to 96:2a:6f:b6:d7:9f (try 2/3) > [64415.063575] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: Not associated and the session > protection is over already... > [64415.063668] wlan0: Connection to AP 96:2a:6f:b6:d7:9f lost > [64416.215729] wlan0: send auth to 96:2a:6f:b6:d7:9f (try 3/3) > > Regards, > -Denis