From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b6-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BF321917C2 for ; Tue, 13 May 2025 14:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.157 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747146310; cv=none; b=nqBxAi3TTvwijyWO53t7WL3esHtmyqA0TB3PNpYMJvcDQgDveKALHkD5Je6X1E3IyrPMQK+jdbtQWHNiG6z5xvjfehAEJY7hnFnYA5i8+ahODRiWSjiCTzYAHoIbDuLThcrNYCsC+KtFgD7R1hEoo/BWBrJLhVV0dzy7EEPV8/k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747146310; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lmx8RgUTBI6bef6A2gfjZF76O+7zIgQlfyMg9m44diU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IKmxmEIqkQbbh4JXKOZXPD9eBsGHyv361EMBrN+VSpULjmHfC+ragEvLf+7WE1CYKzGbpNkksjD85LhRg9vx8+HyEVYfvJcM9w/IK51WnG/iZY6LXpz6N7aIV6eWh0ib+ZvhnO4dFsUUChQrwKI6VTdRFEX9xwW9J+qEE/AfKb8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=jfarr.cc; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jfarr.cc; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jfarr.cc header.i=@jfarr.cc header.b=ffyAO/8y; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=DgVCmHeU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.157 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=jfarr.cc Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jfarr.cc Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jfarr.cc header.i=@jfarr.cc header.b="ffyAO/8y"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="DgVCmHeU" Received: from phl-compute-06.internal (phl-compute-06.phl.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7CD2540163; Tue, 13 May 2025 10:25:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-06.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 13 May 2025 10:25:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jfarr.cc; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1747146307; x=1747232707; bh=vCtF7YhDgs 2WZWiSSactKcsJ5qKSu3nmlt5/29u6k0E=; b=ffyAO/8yMGLrQUq+pGd4/wUF+N lz86FfW4EEiZ2hJJ5mjiATQYsakNMRcy1+ymsJxDUkc4Tt6vFQPlPcI9e9nXuhsC eEv/ygJeQGdf7tM1genaXXqUR5Wqfk8KKkRM14EjkJmvcFHHuGzJuDnxdBwKfINc t/D+QrVEso37fWWG+kZZ9EzGpDYkd9sSiLjsUGkZUI1ANKBq3cv3F6Kcij/9b3YB 28OXk5wxSa5BS9uDwDjZ/ONy3qY5OuciC1C18VOt6/zMZlrzlR1+GCuK4KFLGf0E ulSnWc6m0E+H1PuQiWtu7UCmhzS72Tg8mUa6tPIHv3JFz1eup9Vb81hWkZSA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1747146307; x=1747232707; bh=vCtF7YhDgs2WZWiSSactKcsJ5qKSu3nmlt5 /29u6k0E=; b=DgVCmHeUbM/fHiujxkrxpp+LqHw8Qy3H4I4xaAQpmCb+KEgkCDT gnMhSURxStxRAFinovHFQX+xxDKSabhwserpmXr1gOp90JHtZoxFTwEqi1T0gHlx kPzLGrWit3pLdT9CumOzjUGwb8UAk6qiSOKnH9qJfPJWBMRrBm3UACSnZcU9/swG e0q5HLW8uoFLCRa7ynVZxugfpvthzAHjZqUE5tbjw0vlpl1ld62kSSZYEVSP5WqZ VUcdgMETq+WwyN6Tx0mQjpKOjNh6kmIzee5G6AEi8ItfUv/SD36g6fdlZVC4mfFK glZ0YEgaxTcq5XzcmN6rFdUB9EWZYbw28jw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdeftdegfeegucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpih gvnhhtshculddquddttddmnegfrhhlucfvnfffucdlfedtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefu kfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpeflrghnucfjvghnughrihhkucfhrg hrrhcuoehkvghrnhgvlhesjhhfrghrrhdrtggtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeugfet vdduiefgkeelgfettdfgfffftedtieduhfduhedvvddtveehtedtieeuheenucffohhmrg hinhepphgtrghpnhhgrdhithenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehkvghrnhgvlhesjhhfrghrrhdrtggtpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhope eipdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopeguvghnkhgvnhiisehgmhgrihhl rdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhohhgrnhhnvghssehsihhpshholhhuthhiohhnshdrnh gvthdprhgtphhtthhopehprhgvshhtfihojhesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthho pehlihhnuhigqdifihhrvghlvghsshesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtph htthhopehmihhrihgrmhdrrhgrtghhvghlrdhkohhrvghnsghlihhtsehinhhtvghlrdgt ohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepihifugeslhhishhtshdrlhhinhhugidruggvvh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i01d149f8:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 13 May 2025 10:25:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 16:25:03 +0200 From: Jan Hendrik Farr To: Denis Kenzior Cc: Johannes Berg , James Prestwood , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Miri Korenblit , iwd@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: wifi: iwlwifi: SAE fails when AP sends confirm before STA Message-ID: References: <4ffbeb94-ac19-4437-9d98-24981fe6c240@gmail.com> <15943a1f-0e5d-4705-b8ef-3f22fa3fe672@gmail.com> <902daf8802c723d72fff0155cd0638848ce1bc7f.camel@sipsolutions.net> <8a1c5172bc0fd9d2a33522294d1a2a4c4ceb313a.camel@sipsolutions.net> <562c4ac5-088d-4bab-9883-1d4f8eca2b2a@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On 13 16:19:08, Jan Hendrik Farr wrote: > On 13 09:03:54, Denis Kenzior wrote: > > Hi Jan, > > > > > > > > There is a an SAE confirm sent by the AP. It's frame 170 in > > > capture2.pcapng. It's also retried a number of times after that. > > > > > > > What I also find interesting is that the kernel on the client side reports > > sending the Authenticate-Confirm 3 times (according to dmesg and > > trace2.dat), but only a single Confirm from the client is seen in the air > > trace. I'm guessing the retransmissions (attempt 2 & 3) are lost somehow?. > > Yes this is weird. On my first capture I did see those additional > confirm frames from the client (frame 4007 and 4052 in capture.pcapng). Correction frame 879 and 940. Those other frame number were from another capture I didn't send. > So maybe the capture device missed them in the second capture? Although > the RSSIs look good in the 2nd capture. > > > > > [64414.164169] wlan0: send auth to 96:2a:6f:b6:d7:9f (try 2/3) > > [64415.063575] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: Not associated and the session > > protection is over already... > > [64415.063668] wlan0: Connection to AP 96:2a:6f:b6:d7:9f lost > > [64416.215729] wlan0: send auth to 96:2a:6f:b6:d7:9f (try 3/3) > > > > Regards, > > -Denis