From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E3611DED5F; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752567496; cv=none; b=TYoPOaPYjENW8krnwzydO4zVjPD96hR11JjGDwKAIYu5i0wp8aQMGjaUQqTiM+GcneWFdQN/Fp2jRfNIyhtKDNukjqekGJODq23JLRka533s6puoaNOCE2mNgXlUUPxlzHxvGD88e92bfy7TyVuWpUTncFUPxX+oeEOp2z1PcHU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752567496; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MFb8FgT6fSDI2D8rxvLxQMAJT9ijx7F8oDCj6Wg1Pro=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OiQmoaX+quGhyebJ7F05e/Q0os1lkYbgR23Efm41GWRLyUw5swBLJUFQZsoiVDoplJtI1jKcQjD+G1vn/5LIajXZePv2AYAe6nYPQdYzveX6tI6/4wMDr5mvQ4erS2BQJo4WA8cJMND3UNSxM6uCZs1RryJb6SYLuaJ497Y0k04= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=cnGW+Fpp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="cnGW+Fpp" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1752567496; x=1784103496; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=MFb8FgT6fSDI2D8rxvLxQMAJT9ijx7F8oDCj6Wg1Pro=; b=cnGW+FppetSHosplfASeZhSs+YWKh1nguWcCgPodNn+7a55XT2iEP8j/ 7jjK8QVmss7GoU+z8TRuUfjJj7UwHt9TujfypCrqvJnNfuO3VT3LwHz4u ktg4jTmkXETieTZPqyXyWrgf0LWVmR8coD06skgTbVUDpuKQu9CBQDhVk Cl21CViB36QdHb8ZYHIOi4lZqnDehqWowBcCqNkEl50tEWJZgQAZl3Asi tfV93K9SMB/F4MLehra7jKhWbtTluTAzedTvWEEI7FC11FgG3ZT+P4L02 BJc08U/Ceq1M9BUjXi4vvy1QNyB4HPji2BsZs6kfe7Zs14zbf7cQvaDwJ w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: MH3lyqtWTlOTEaCLCT9xRA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: NudytUpiRXup5AMsAvhw/A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11491"; a="54923253" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,313,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="54923253" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jul 2025 01:18:15 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: hVIFMryWQF+6/SHveef8aw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Sqi4fyYWRDecr+pZkdKjEw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,313,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="188149175" Received: from ettammin-desk.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO kekkonen.fi.intel.com) ([10.245.244.145]) by orviesa002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jul 2025 01:18:13 -0700 Received: from kekkonen.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kekkonen.fi.intel.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E08FA11F87A; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 11:18:09 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:18:09 +0000 Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo From: Sakari Ailus To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Mark Greer , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 50/80] nfc: trf7970a: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls Message-ID: References: <20250704075225.3212486-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20250704075439.3221036-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <51feb545-42a4-4f8b-a983-59104980f97d@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51feb545-42a4-4f8b-a983-59104980f97d@kernel.org> Hi Krzysztof, On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 10:03:27AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 04/07/2025 09:54, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(), > > pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call > > to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to > > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus > > --- > > The cover letter of the set can be found here > > . > > > > In brief, this patch depends on PM runtime patches adding marking the last > > busy timestamp in autosuspend related functions. The patches are here, on > > rc2: > > > > You did not send cover letter to people, so this changelog should > explain what I should do with this patch (what is the merging/dependency). I didn't as it would have had too many recipients (more than 200 in fact). As you may have noticed, the URL for the cover letter is a few lines above, also its Message-ID can be found in the In-reply-to: header. -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus