public inbox for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Wilhelm <alexander.wilhelm@westermo.com>
To: Nicolas Escande <nico.escande@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@kernel.org>,
	ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Missing BEACON_LOSS event
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 11:00:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aInfPSL+ofPfqrRY@FUE-ALEWI-WINX> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DBP862N3JBT3.2NRSJ8BECF0YI@gmail.com>

Am Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 09:52:16AM +0200 schrieb Nicolas Escande:
> On Tue Jul 29, 2025 at 3:03 PM CEST, Alexander Wilhelm wrote:
> > Hello devs,
> >
> > can someone help with the following issue?
> >
> > I'm using a QCN9074-based device in STA mode, connected to an access point. When
> > the AP is powered off (without sending a deauthentication frame), the client
> > remains indefinitely associated. There is no disconnect, no beacon loss event,
> > and the RSSI remains stuck at the last known value.
> [...]
> > From what I can tell, the function `ath11k_mac_handle_beacon_miss()` exists and
> > is wired up via `ath11k_roam_event()`, but the firmware never seems to send
> > `WMI_ROAM_EVENTID`, so the handler is never triggered.
> >
> > Is this expected behavior? Does the firmware need to be configured differently
> > to enable beacon miss detection in STA mode? Or is this a known limitation? Any
> > help or clarification would be appreciated.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I've brought this up already on the ath11k/ath12k list:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/ath12k/CZA2NS7J83D4.18SU6W9R96KPY@gmail.com/__;!!I9LPvj3b!A_l1xrZCr5Oo1_ZCUkIiXoWPpFN0WLWL0jzZvD_tjkUbOJTC-SHA0CC0HrtcXfPeOOb3729mKsEecEcXslQ0X9e4o9WHOw$ 
> To my knowlege, nothing upstream has been posted so far by QCA.
> 
> In non mainline sources there is a patch to support ath12k:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/qsdk/oss/system/feeds/wlan-open/-/blob/win.wlan_host_opensource.3.0/patches/ath12k/897-wifi-ath12k-Add-support-for-STA-mode-to-trigger.patch__;!!I9LPvj3b!A_l1xrZCr5Oo1_ZCUkIiXoWPpFN0WLWL0jzZvD_tjkUbOJTC-SHA0CC0HrtcXfPeOOb3729mKsEecEcXslQ0X9dH40t43A$ 
> My guess is that ath11k works the same way.

Thank you for your response, Nicolas. It helps me a lot. Most of the patch code
is already part of `ath11k` driver. I will port the remaining part that
implements the `ath11k_peer_sta_kickout_event` for STA for me until another
firmware/driver solution is proposed.


Best regards
Alexander Wilhelm

      reply	other threads:[~2025-07-30  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-29 13:03 Missing BEACON_LOSS event Alexander Wilhelm
2025-07-30  7:52 ` Nicolas Escande
2025-07-30  9:00   ` Alexander Wilhelm [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aInfPSL+ofPfqrRY@FUE-ALEWI-WINX \
    --to=alexander.wilhelm@westermo.com \
    --cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=jjohnson@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nico.escande@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox