From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C714B3939BD; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 06:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774852200; cv=none; b=ZE8+zWOH/xFU4y0/V7Av4QvE3iF1mXtb2BRrU6M3nnuahze+9aoxdV/qYsh2QdxieB1f45IMcMLlFhpRiNJ+SP/OCjwyH2ORc5Tj3uGCH3q8+Jb/N2hOmgdmuyc7/aTWSVl36rnqXlksnuedHEXcnlcriLHhYR1P003ngQJ9wwY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774852200; c=relaxed/simple; bh=035aYXpJRW2cnLWGbph4ptLu8VVBvXeKIlejv+8hpVw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rKUB/HvM8idLE+VChDpRclsygw3OWSUrmo1TIejpatG0W/ADcsIyvc6h+ZF/sAIhlToychHSLMzLTFp6iCKD+Ks0Q7RYYQiV/FFpMzAmgeSFdNxeiZjCfimqeyjuJ3bhywmWeYDpF3vIXajMQhUNbuDd/ZV7ie5vlrtYCNUAZKM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=sAap5ILN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="sAap5ILN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0708CC4CEF7; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 06:29:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774852200; bh=035aYXpJRW2cnLWGbph4ptLu8VVBvXeKIlejv+8hpVw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=sAap5ILNduf99Z2ehiqgpjwUfo5MqIvhYLE72v04gGyFNT1vPdmm2znMIBN/1WPxv KFsmu4d/uEKwe4XwHGphBp0Vw7GsXJYYR6ENvjTAL0kG+11TPgBF7lAskT6NKaKXv3 SqpRuekj2IYI74IFT03P/UKrpKruyJc/fJrbTlvXFEZhcfnBYmP2r3QBNjMbvr6xs6 X0Rgga6H6yaX5JaJ96l+QcsN4bSAW7HOePJIybS6egOCDftuDv/k3vMpPAGFTMgv5p zdmnBwa7Ysw4rlo8bnuuyuRkb457dCwRAwGl8aiZEoem/hIHfd217rZEav/6X6pLnq CcrmVuNPPxuXw== Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 11:59:41 +0530 From: Sumit Garg To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Mukesh Ojha , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath12k@lists.infradead.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org, konradybcio@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com, sean@poorly.run, akhilpo@oss.qualcomm.com, lumag@kernel.org, abhinav.kumar@linux.dev, jesszhan0024@gmail.com, marijn.suijten@somainline.org, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch, vikash.garodia@oss.qualcomm.com, dikshita.agarwal@oss.qualcomm.com, bod@kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org, elder@kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, jjohnson@kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, trilokkumar.soni@oss.qualcomm.com, pavan.kondeti@oss.qualcomm.com, jorge.ramirez@oss.qualcomm.com, tonyh@qti.qualcomm.com, vignesh.viswanathan@oss.qualcomm.com, srinivas.kandagatla@oss.qualcomm.com, amirreza.zarrabi@oss.qualcomm.com, jens.wiklander@linaro.org, op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, apurupa@qti.qualcomm.com, skare@qti.qualcomm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sumit Garg Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] firmware: qcom: Add a generic PAS service Message-ID: References: <20260312062756.694390-1-sumit.garg@kernel.org> <20260312062756.694390-3-sumit.garg@kernel.org> <20260313072450.sx7vqtvh62nflhff@hu-mojha-hyd.qualcomm.com> <2da6cbcc-677d-4ba8-9762-ecb47b157f21@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2da6cbcc-677d-4ba8-9762-ecb47b157f21@kernel.org> On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 02:39:24PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 23/03/2026 13:50, Sumit Garg wrote: > >>> + > >>> +#include > >>> +#include > >>> +#include > >>> +#include > >>> + > >>> +#include "qcom_pas.h" > >>> + > >>> +struct qcom_pas_ops *ops_ptr; > >> > >> Should this be static ? > > > > It was static earlier in v1. I dropped it based on earlier v1 discussion > > with Krzysztof. Let me conclude that discussion on the other thread > > again. > > The discussion was whether this should be singleton in the first place, > not making it a global singleton. > > Of course it cannot be anything else than static - nothing should poke here. Sure, I have put the static back for v3. -Sumit