From: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>
To: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"Korenblit, Miriam Rachel" <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: iwlwifi: network not back after resuming from suspend since v6.15-rc2
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 18:13:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agGo8Hu-8Jw9lg9n@Rk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d143832c8fdb8c39ee7daa5002cda9e5a26921e.camel@intel.com>
On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 07:17:31AM +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
>Hi,
Your quick reply is much appreciated:)
>
>
>On Mon, 2026-05-11 at 14:49 +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>
>> I notice since v6.15-rc2, most of the times the network won't be back
>> again after resuming from suspend. And sometimes I need to run
>> "systemctl suspend" for 8 or 9 consecutive times to make WIFI
>> available
>> again. bisect and manual reverting show 15220a257319 ("wifi: iwlwifi:
>> don't warn if the NIC is gone in resume") is the 1st bad commit.
>>
>
>This is ... strange.
>Can you try to use our backport tree?
>https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/backport-iwlwifi.git/log/
>
>I am pretty sure it won't solve anything, but at least, it'll make it
>easier for us to work together on this issue.
>
>Also, may I suggest you open a bugzilla ticket on the drivers /
>wireless-intel component?
>As a starting point, I'll absolutely need the kernel log.
Thanks for the suggestion! I've filed
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221501
with kernel logs after reproducing the issue using the backport tree
version.
>
>
>> Here are some other clues that may help resolve this issue,
>>
>> 1. An iwlwifi setting [1] can make this issue disappear,
>> options iwlwifi swcrypto=0
>> options iwlwifi bt_coex_active=0
>> options iwlwifi power_save=0
>> options iwlwifi uapsd_disable=1
>> options iwlmvm power_scheme=1
>
>This is even more strange.
>
>>
>> 2. Before v6.15-rc2, the issue rarely happens. And if it
>> happens,
>> simply suspending once can bring the network online again.
>> Other
>> users seem to have experienced the same issue e.g. [2][3][4].
>>
>> 3. Suspending by "rtcwake -m mem -s 5" instead of by "systemcl
>> suspend"
>> can make it much easier to reproduce this issue for kernels
>> older
>> than v6.15-rc2.
>>
>> If you need more details from me, feel free to let me know! And I'll
>> very happy to test any possible solutions. Thanks!
>
>My problem here is that we seem to be talking about "the issue" but we
>don't know exactly which one... Let's start with a bugzilla ticket with
>logs.
Sorry I can only describe the issue as "network unavailable after
resuming from suspend". I've opened the ticket. Please let me know if
you need further info to narrow down the issue and find the root cause.
Meanwhile I'll also do some experiments like reverting the 1st bad
commit in the backport tree.
>
><snip>
>
>> I can't bisect against upstream kernel directly because v6.15-rc2
>> won't
>> be able to mount my root partition. So I manually reverted upstream
>> 15220a257319 ("wifi: iwlwifi: don't warn if the NIC is gone in
>> resume")
>> in v6.15 to confirm it's indeed the bad commit.
>>
>> [1] https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2227202#p2227202
>> [2] https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=301971
>> [3]
>> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/random-wi-fi-adapter-loss-on-fedora-42-intel-alder-lake-p-cnvi/152878
>> [4]
>> https://forums.opensuse.org/t/wifi-suddenly-no-more-available/184399
>> [5]
>> https://github.com/coiby/kernel-auto-bisect/tree/random_issue_bisect
>> [6] https://github.com/rhkdump/kernel-auto-bisect
>> [7]
>> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/commit/6453e892cf86c900d51f5884e9013e0dbeeea4ad
>>
>
>Those tickets are all over the place and unfortunately, nothing very
>conclusive comes up from those links.
--
Best regards,
Coiby
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 6:49 iwlwifi: network not back after resuming from suspend since v6.15-rc2 Coiby Xu
2026-05-11 7:17 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2026-05-11 10:13 ` Coiby Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agGo8Hu-8Jw9lg9n@Rk \
--to=coiby.xu@gmail.com \
--cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox