Re: [PATCH 4/11] use ether_addr_equal_64bits

Julia Lawall
2013-12-30T19:58:59Z

> Seems to be missing an "iwlwifi:" or so prefix, but I guess we can add
> it when we take the patch ...

Sorry. Not sure why that happened. I'll look into it.

> Is there any way we could catch (sparse, or some other script?) that
> struct reorganising won't break the condition needed ("within a
> structure that contains at least two more bytes")?

What kind of reorganizing could happen? Do you mean that the programmer
might do at some time in the future, or something the compiler might do?

julia