From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Elias Oltmanns <eo@nebensachen.de>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ath5k: kernel timing screwed - due to unserialised register access?
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:59:05 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0810052354000.3398@apollo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k5cm3ee2.fsf@denkblock.local>
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Elias Oltmanns wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> on my system, I observe some odd symptoms which I have troubled Thomas
> with before. After some more investigation, I have come to the
> conclusion that ath5k is at the bottom of this, but since I don't really
> understand the connection, I thought that Thomas may perhaps throw some
> light on the matter, after all, even though I still think that ath5k
> will have to be fixed. The Behaviour I'm seeing is this: sometimes,
> timers fire prematurely, i.e. a timer x started with
>
> mod_timer(&x, HZ/50);
>
> fires after less than 10 or even 1 msec rather than 20 msec. Trying to
> get to the bottom of this, it struck me that these glitches only occur
> when ath5k is loaded and an interface is brought up (ifconfig wlan0 up
> is quite sufficient). Some more digging revealed that the occurrences of
> such ``fast forward events'' coincided with the expiry of the
> recalibration timer started for the interface. The same behaviour can be
> observed on kernels 2.6.25.16, 2.6.26.5, 2.6.27-rc8-git8 and
> next-20080919.
We had an intermittent problem with jffies based timers between
2.6.27-rc6 and -rc8-latest. This is fixed in current mainline. It only
happened when CONFIG_NOHZ=n and CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=n or both
options were disabled at the kernel commandline.
I have no idea why this should happen on any other kernel versions.
Can you please point me to the code in question (file, line number) ?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-05 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-05 21:45 ath5k: kernel timing screwed - due to unserialised register access? Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-05 21:59 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2008-10-06 14:04 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-06 19:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-07 15:27 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-07 18:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-07 18:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-07 21:23 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-08 11:39 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-08 21:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-09 11:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-10 8:33 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-10 10:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-10 11:50 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-10 12:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-10 12:59 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-10 21:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-11 9:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-10 19:24 ` Nick Kossifidis
2008-10-11 9:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-11 20:30 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-14 19:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-14 22:01 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-15 8:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-15 16:32 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-15 19:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-17 21:03 ` Elias Oltmanns
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0810052354000.3398@apollo \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=eo@nebensachen.de \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).