From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Elias Oltmanns <eo@nebensachen.de>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ath5k: kernel timing screwed - due to unserialised register access?
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:55:41 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0810111155250.3356@apollo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081010213207.GA7852@infradead.org>
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 02:59:28PM +0200, Elias Oltmanns wrote:
> > That was my first thought when I discovered this. However, from what I
> > read on the web, I somehow got the impression that [um]delay() was
> > alright as opposed to msleep(). What exactly is the difference then?
>
> Yes, only msleep() sleeps, mdelay spins.
Opps, right.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-11 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-05 21:45 ath5k: kernel timing screwed - due to unserialised register access? Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-05 21:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-06 14:04 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-06 19:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-07 15:27 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-07 18:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-07 18:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-07 21:23 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-08 11:39 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-08 21:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-09 11:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-10 8:33 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-10 10:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-10 11:50 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-10 12:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-10 12:59 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-10 21:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-11 9:55 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2008-10-10 19:24 ` Nick Kossifidis
2008-10-11 9:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-11 20:30 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-14 19:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-14 22:01 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-15 8:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-15 16:32 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-15 19:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-17 21:03 ` Elias Oltmanns
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0810111155250.3356@apollo \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=eo@nebensachen.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox