From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f219.google.com ([209.85.219.219]:50926 "EHLO mail-ew0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752058Ab0AROQJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:16:09 -0500 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so580845ewy.21 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:16:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <69e28c911001171628s684df11avb3e9f9586e64b69e@mail.gmail.com> References: <69e28c911001171628s684df11avb3e9f9586e64b69e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:16:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5 V2] b43: N-PHY: implement and add multi-dimensional table writing From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Stefanik?= Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "John W. Linville" , "bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: W dniu 18 stycznia 2010 01:28 użytkownik Gábor Stefanik napisał: > 2010/1/18 Rafał Miłecki : >> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki >> --- >> V2: updated to apply without fuzz > > Actually, you do not need to do that - offset or fuzzy patches will > still be applied cleanly AFAIK, without any intervention. > (John, correct me if I'm wrong here...) That's right, it actually did. I just wanted to don't bother John with wondering if everything gone correctly. I guess I could just mention it instead of sending patch :) -- Rafał