Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] wifi: mwifiex: add code to support host mlme

[Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>]

On Wed, 2024-03-20 at 01:10 +0000, David Lin wrote:
> > > 
> > > Also decl.h should probably _shrink_ rather than grow, a number of
> > > things just replicate ieee80211.h (such as MWIFIEX_MGMT_HEADER_LEN
> > > really is just
> > > sizeof(ieee80211_mgmt) or so? Not quite correctly.)
> > > 
> > 
> > This can be done for feature patches.

But this is a feature patch :-)

> > > So yeah, agree with Brian, not only would this be the first, but it's
> > > also something we don't really _want_. All other drivers that want
> > > stuff like this are stuck in staging ...
> > > 
> > > So why is this needed for a supposedly "firmware does it all" driver,
> > > and why can it not be integrated with mac80211 if it's no longer "firmware
> > does it all"?
> > > 
> > > Johannes
> > 
> > Our proprietary driver is cfg80211 driver, it is very hard to create a brand new
> > mac80211 driver and still can port all tested stuffs from our proprietary driver.

That basically doesn't matter for upstream at all.

> 
> BTW, vendor should have the choice to use cfg80211 or mac80211 for their chips, right?

No, that's not how it works. The choice should be what makes sense
architecturally.

johannes