From: Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com>
To: "Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"michal.kazior@tieto.com" <michal.kazior@tieto.com>,
"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 05/11] ath10k: htc: refactorization
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 22:07:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3068401-aee9-47bc-141e-692ea72ffb74@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871sxay66a.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
On 12/14/2016 02:46 PM, Valo, Kalle wrote:
> Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I have made a few updates since I submitted the original RFC and created
>> a repo on github:
>>
>> https://github.com/erstrom/linux-ath
>>
>> I have a bunch of branches that are all based on the tags on the ath master.
>>
>> As of this moment the latest version is:
>>
>> ath-201612131156-ath10k-sdio
>>
>> This branch contains the original RFC patches plus some addons/fixes.
>
> Good, this makes it easier to follow the development. So what's the
> current status with this branch? What works and what doesn't?
>
Well, everything in there has been tested (limited though, as you
yourself experienced), but it is not complete. I still have some other
patches that need some more refurbishing before I can push them.
I will push those patches that I consider "good enough" for publish to
this repo. Most likely I will rewrite/squash etc. some of it before
submitting a new RFC series.
So, there are still some additional stuff that needs to be added. In my
case I have a series of patches related to OCB (Outside the Context of a
BSS) mode of operation (since the chipset I am using is intended for
this purpose). These patches are still not complete.
Other SDIO 11ac chipsets might just need an item in the struct
ath10k_hw_params array together with some firmware files.
> Especially I'm interested about the state of the HTT high latency
> support. How much work is to add that? It would also make it easier to
> add USB support to ath10k.
>
I actually have some patches regarding this, but they have not been
tested at all since I have not yet managed to fully configure my SDIO
chip properly so far. I must finish the OCB code I mentioned earlier and
fix another really annoying issue with a missing HTT version response
(sometimes target won't respond to the HTT version request).
Then, hopefully, I can make some TX and RX tests.
I think the HTT TX part is fairly straight forward. But the RX part is a
little bit more tricky since I am not really sure about how to interface
mac80211 in the RX path.
My work flow goes like this:
As soon as there is a new tag on the ath.git master, I rebase my stuff
on top of it and push a new branch to my repo.
I will continuously push updates to the latest branch (the branch based
on the latest ath tag).
Older branches will not be maintained.
/Erik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-14 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-18 19:22 [RFC v2 00/11] ath10k sdio support Erik Stromdahl
2016-11-18 19:22 ` [RFC v2 01/11] ath10k: htc: made static function public Erik Stromdahl
2016-11-18 19:22 ` [RFC v2 02/11] ath10k: htc: rx trailer lookahead support Erik Stromdahl
2016-11-18 19:22 ` [RFC v2 03/11] ath10k: htc: Removal of unused struct members Erik Stromdahl
2016-11-18 19:22 ` [RFC v2 04/11] ath10k: htc: Changed order of wait target and ep connect Erik Stromdahl
2016-11-18 19:22 ` [RFC v2 05/11] ath10k: htc: refactorization Erik Stromdahl
2016-12-13 13:44 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-12-13 13:52 ` Michal Kazior
2016-12-13 17:26 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-12-13 18:37 ` Erik Stromdahl
2016-12-13 19:21 ` Michal Kazior
2016-12-14 13:49 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-12-14 13:46 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-12-14 21:07 ` Erik Stromdahl [this message]
2016-11-18 19:22 ` [RFC v2 06/11] ath10k: htc: Added ATH10K_HTC_FLAG_BUNDLE_LSB Erik Stromdahl
2016-12-16 10:23 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-11-18 19:22 ` [RFC v2 07/11] ath10k: Added SDIO dbg masks Erik Stromdahl
2016-11-18 19:22 ` [RFC v2 08/11] ath10k: Added ATH10K_BUS_SDIO enum Erik Stromdahl
2016-11-18 19:22 ` [RFC v2 09/11] ath10k: Mailbox address definitions Erik Stromdahl
2016-11-18 19:22 ` [RFC v2 10/11] ath10k: Added more host_interest members Erik Stromdahl
2016-11-18 19:22 ` [RFC v2 11/11] ath10k: Added sdio support Erik Stromdahl
2016-12-13 13:10 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-12-15 16:40 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-12-15 20:52 ` Erik Stromdahl
2016-12-16 11:21 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-12-20 18:14 ` Erik Stromdahl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b3068401-aee9-47bc-141e-692ea72ffb74@gmail.com \
--to=erik.stromdahl@gmail.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).